The AI-Native Blockchain for the Agent Economy & RWA
Joined April 2023
- Tweets1.4K
- Following53
- Followers15.2K
- Likes747
Long-horizon tasks and extended verification loops are a major step forward for AI.
But as agents take on more complex work, capability alone isn't enough. Clear permissions, verifiable actions, and human oversight must be built into how they operate.
Start building with Gemini 4 Carbon: our strongest model for complex, long-horizon tasks.
It’s designed to explore problems thoroughly and run extended verification loops across software engineering, cybersecurity, knowledge work, and science.
8
482
🔧 Infrastructure Updates
📊 BDEX V2 and V3 trading volume and fee data are now available on DeFiLlama, making protocol activity easier to track.
🏆 BOT Chain is also refining its Ecosystem Leaderboard and community incentive experience.
1
2
77
Corporate actions are a good reminder that tokenization doesn’t end at issuance.
When the underlying asset changes, the onchain record has to stay accurate too.
That’s part of the real RWA infrastructure challenge: not just putting assets onchain, but keeping their state aligned over time.
Not every smart contract interaction needs a transaction.
🔹 Read: `eth_call` lets you check on-chain data without changing the state.
🔹 Write: Changing state requires a transaction, gas, and confirmation.
Knowing when to use each helps developers avoid unnecessary wallet prompts and build smoother dApp experiences.
A successful deployment doesn't mean a contract is ready for users.
Before sharing it, check the network and address, verify the source code, and test key functions and permissions.
Source verification makes a contract easier to inspect. It doesn't automatically make it secure.
Vitalik’s emphasis on stability is especially relevant as AI moves onchain.
For AI agents and RWA, dependable infrastructure matters: clear ownership, secure permissions, and systems people can trust with real assets and decisions.
Expanding on why I believe "ETH as store of value (SoV)" makes much more sense to focus on than "ETH as fee-burning token".
Three primary reasons:
1. ETH as fee-burning token never was as strong as it seemed
2. Optimizing for ETH as fee-burning token would demand Ethereum and ETH function in ways that are very hard to make compatible with decentralization and capture resistance.
3. Meanwhile, optimizing for ETH as SoV is aligned with Ethereum focusing on its unique strengths (decentralization and CROPS)
EIP-1559 (including its burn) is fine and good, we should keep them. But we should not feel sad if fee burn is < 10% of breakeven indefinitely; the value of ETH comes from elsewhere.
The core idea: the big thing that people appreciate about Ethereum is decentralization and CROPS. The main pragmatic benefit that these things translate into is stability. SoV is the category where that is not an unneeded extra we merely put effort into for ideological reasons, but rather a pragmatic strength from the perspective of people putting in their assets. And in the era of AI disruption, stability will be highly valued.
A dashboard can look up to date while its indexed data is still a few blocks behind.
For AI agents making on-chain decisions, response speed isn't enough. They also need to know which block the data comes from and how far it is from the chain head.
Before acting on data, check how fresh it actually is.
