A BTC crypto big timer

🎸
Joined January 2024
thinking about kanye west writing a whole essay on his blog over a pap pic of rihanna getting into a cab like a prophet announcing the birth of a legend (2008)
56
1,262
132
11,607
234,586
TTD retweeted
ngl i be sneak shazaming
356
18,281
1,158
92,766
2,288,180
TTD retweeted
falling asleep on planes is a feminine trait what do you mean your brain allows you to let your guard down 35,000 feet above the ground in a compressed tin can with no way out if you feel ‘sleepy’ in this situation then you do not have true warrior blood it’s not time to sleep, we are VERY far from base camp and MUST stay alert
647
221
83
4,449
824,071
benders keep u hot & skinny
100
2,268
289
8,600
TTD retweeted
incredible article extremely well reasoned in a clear, cogent manner this is the stuff you expect VCs to produce but never do 11/10
87
156
8
2,925
1,066,506
TTD retweeted
In western culture, a young white man traditionally signals his entry into upper middle class society by making a trip to Japan
341
6,133
356
141,838
3,511,663
you work with boomers long enough the ellipses .... just sort of creep on you .... its so easy .... so calming ........
57
898
58
18,913
300,741
crypto is going through its venture --> liquid transition as an investible asset class. most infra has been built, most chains we need exist. there is less of a need for massive vc rounds for infra slop and most funding is now focused on the app layer. this layer needs less vc capital in general and is suited for smaller funds and angels. mega-vc's no longer needed or desired. crypto vcs starting to diversify into other asset classes is a healthy and natural consequence of this. there are other industries that are only venture investable at this stage, where as crypto is no longer this way. we are slowly unfucking the tokens and moving towards a much healthier liquid market. high fdvs have been sent to hades, investor skepticism around non-rev protocols has only gotten louder and more detrimental to those tokens, and real, sustainable revenue generating protocols are emerging and being rewarded. it's an exciting time to be a liquid crypto investor. crypto is still the best technology in the world to move and trade assets and the next few years will solidify this. everything is coming onchain. strap in, buckle up, hold onto your butts, lock the fuck in. we're making crypto cool again.
83
121
42
834
170,260
2.5 years ago I was trading a coin named after Drake's cat, joined TGs and raided to pump my shitters, and thought "American Coin" would get me out of 5 figure hell
50
TTD retweeted
Think that in this zero-friction / abundance world, capability will become the new luxury and flex The old flex was “I don’t have to deal with this.” Driver, concierge, business class, staff, everything handled The new one is “I don’t have to, but I still can” For most of history, status meant not having to do things yourself. The flex was insulation. But if Uber/AI/delivery/concierge-level services become available to basically every affluent person, then “I never have to deal with this” stops being an interesting signal. What becomes impressive is the person who doesn’t need the infrastructure despite having access to it Because there’s a weird point where convenience stops expanding your range and starts shrinking it. Uber everywhere until a 20-min walk feels annoying. Business class until economy becomes “impossible”. Five-star hotels until a slightly shit room genuinely ruins the trip. Assistant handles every booking / complaint / bit of admin until some restaurant losing your reservation becomes a problem you don’t even think of solving yourself. You’re objectively richer and more comfortable, but the number of situations you can happily operate in keeps getting smaller You see the extreme version with properly rich people. Driver, chef, assistant, concierge, house manager, travel agent, members’ club, someone to fix basically anything that goes wrong. Again all amazing individually, I’d happily use half of them. But stack enough infrastructure around yourself and eventually you become weirdly dependent on it. There’s a difference between having someone make your life easier and reaching a point where normal life feels difficult without them Think that’s the part people miss when talking about freedom. We usually measure it by what you can afford: can fly private, stay anywhere, have someone handle everything. But there’s another kind of freedom which is basically how wide your acceptable range still is. Can you take the Subway, eat somewhere random, deal with a cancelled flight, navigate a new city, sleep somewhere basic, cook for yourself, change plans when something is fucked. Money should increase the number of lives you could comfortably live, not progressively narrow them It’s also probably why the wealth curve gets so funny at the top. Poor people suffer involuntarily friction, the middle class spends decades paying to remove it, then rich people start paying $$$ to put it back in (Marathons, sailing, remote expeditions, climbing mountains, fasting, silent retreats, difficult travel etc.) Basically spending 20 years making sure you never have to be cold / hungry / lost / uncomfortable, then pay $10k to be all four in Patagonia And tbh I don’t think that’s contradictory. Once comfort is abundant, difficulty becomes scarce. More importantly, chosen difficulty is a way of checking you can still function without all the infrastructure around you. The remote trip / marathon / whatever isn’t valuable because suffering is somehow virtuous. Part of the appeal is probably just proving to yourself that convenience hasn’t made you incapable Obviously I’m not going to start flying economy for character development or cleaning my flat to preserve agency. Use money to remove dumb repetitive shit, that’s literally the point But I increasingly think the real luxury end-state isn’t zero-friction, it’s having complete control over which friction you experience without becoming dependent on everything you bought to remove it
Removing friction is how rich people end up losing agency and human IQ It starts with Uber-everywhere, grocery delivery, all-inclusive holidays, then private driver, chef, assistant etc… without noticing you’re also removing exposure to reality I see this in London with young ambitious professionals aka HENRYs (High Earners Not Rich Yet) trying to remove every tiny friction from life so they can focus on work + gym + sleep + money, while forgetting that a lot of the “inefficient” shit they’re deleting (cooking, walking somewhere, random talks etc) is also just… being a human in your 20s/30s The thing is you’re not only saving time, you’re removing thousands of tiny reps of dealing with the world. Finding the place, fixing the booking, working out what to do when the train gets cancelled, asking someone for help, improvising because the plan is fucked. None of these makes you smarter on its own, but remove basically all of them for 10 years and I’d be surprised if it has zero effect. You can become incredibly high-agency at work while weirdly low-agency at normal life It’s why so many high-agency rich people are deliberately paying to add friction back into their lives (difficult travel, long treks, sailing, marathons, remote places, silent retreats, climbing mountains, etc). They’ve understood that once comfort is abundant, difficulty becomes scarce. The luxury good eventually becomes optional hardship. The distinction is agency. Being forced to walk 10km because your car broke down sucks. Choosing to hike 20km in Patagonia feels meaningful The way I think about it personally is just aggressively remove boring / repetitive friction, while keeping a decent amount of unpredictable friction. I’ll happily pay more for the direct flight, live centrally to kill a commute, outsource cleaning/admin, take the Uber if it genuinely saves 40 mins. A 15-min annoyance x300 a year is actually expensive. There is absolutely no hidden life lesson in doing your laundry for the 800th time or spending 2h getting somewhere you could reach in 30 mins Think the objective of wealth shouldn’t be zero friction, but simply choosing your friction. Basically removing all the boring shit so you can expose yourself to more of the interesting stuff
14
17
7
207
27,877
This is it. I’m telling you, this is it.
205
248
54
4,731
481,333
Barron Trump has made an outstanding impact on my life for the past 3 years Credit where it's due
goodalexander says Barron Trump saved Hyperliquid “The reason Hyperliquid pumped so hard is because a lot of people in the know were like, ‘Oh yeah, Hyperliquid is gonna get prosecuted.’ Obviously, that’s not fucking true” “So if Trump is coming out and saying Hyperliquid, it means Barron was like, ‘Hey dad, no, Hyperliquid’s the jam,’ and that is the policy now” “It’s great for crypto because that means there are more onchain fees and better assets. It’s just unambiguously positive because fees flow to chains, whether that’s Circle’s new chain, Ethereum, or Solana. There’s a race between all these L1s, but at least you’re racing for something instead of racing for an indictment”
126
CME CEO: TRADE[XYZ] AND HYPERLIQUID ARE HAVING AN IMPACT ON US MARKETS.
37
90
40
589
206,931
TTD retweeted
bear market astrology - ogs sell >100k. selling above the 6-fig psychological accomplishment after holding for a decade+. below this round number they'll wait it out. - etf holders (retail and hedge funds) accelerate selling below 100k. they r simply trend-following paperhands. - at some point (80-90k) these sellers exhaust and more long term buyers come in. a local bottom forms. - we pump to near 100k making everyone believe we r back. typical bear market rally that makes bears doubt their view. - "macro" actually deteriorates and we bleed to 60-70k - 6-9mo of consolidation in this area including one final capitulation leg down. no one believes we'll ever come back except for 5 ppl on this site. - new cycle begins.
112
76
29
1,357
171,251
Wow
[🌲] TRUMP: SEC CHAIR WORKING TO BRING HYPERLIQUID INTO US
1
68
My take on society and crypto is really simple. If you have societal level investment, you are accountable for societal level returns. Things are not getting better. We said we have "AI warfare". We are locked in a stalemate with a 3rd world dictatorship who closed the Strait of Hormuz. We were having debates on autonomous weapons. Tell Claude to Open the Strait. He's tired. He needs a nap. His safety settings won't allow him to. But trust me, he could. We're too ethical to let him. Sure. Every airline invested maximally in software automation. And more recently AI support. The airports are more poorly run. The flights don't leave on time. Uber maxed out its Anthropic spend. Countless apps did the same. The apps are not better despite the investment. They go down in prod all the time. People think GDP is going to grow 4.4% per Patrick Collison's survey. I think it will grow about 2%. Anthropic points to high ARR. I think most of that will churn to lower cost models. What will happen next is AI labs will point to unfalsifiable bull cases, similarly to Elon pointing to Data Centers in Space. "Do you know how big the sun is? That's the TAM of Spacex". Similarly - the de-facto Anthropic/OpenAI bull case will be "biological advancement". This both seems like you're curing cancer. At the same time as creating a legislative emergency. "Open source models need to be banned to prevent another COVID". That is the planned narrative and always has been. I don't know if Chinese Open Source models will be banned. I think, probably, if it starts looking like China is competing with ASML and Nvidia. But then, of course, it will be too late. Less ambiguous. There will be a surge in the American Left. My basic thesis is about religion. Because Dario and his Cabal will push too hard on Transhumanism, with biological vaccines. It will alienate the Christian right. "You're playing god with the human genome." Once the Christian right is alienated, Roe v Wade doesn't really work You don't need the profound story to play out. Inflation is high. Trump violated his campaign promises. He said no wars. We are at war. He's visibly declining. You think Thiel is staking out Argentina because he thinks we're getting President Vance? A bit on bio advancement. Some of it might be real. But getting drugs into production is hard. We don't know what a bio utopia looks like. What if it's personalized medicine? A treatment just for you. Who do you test it on? Do you need synthetic humans? Do you know how to underwrite that. I don't. We're already facing a huge lab monkey shortage. It will get worse. I'm not saying AI can't develop drugs. I'm saying that it might take years longer than data center investment cycles for that to translate into meaningful revenue required for justifying societal scale investment. And it's not all curing cancer. At first AI results in huge amounts of hacking. But soon enough it results in perfect code. On all public protocols. Darwinian evolution of all Open Source tech. Do you trust the dev team at SUI more or the Bank of Hawaii's cracked team? The market is betting the ranch on the back office IT departments of regional banks to keep money safe. It will be a fucking nightmare of hacking that's already here in crypto and will hit every other sector regardless of open source AI bans. At the same time, once it's clear that AI investments aren't turbo charging corporate earnings. Stocks will start to drop. More addictive use cases of AI will be deployed at scale. Incentivized gambling. Pornography. Enhancements to the algorithm. Better video games. Video game companies have been memory constrained due to corporate use cases. Once companies stop being rewarded for spending 1/2 their R&D budget on tokens, compute frees up for video. These addictive use cases: roleplaying, personalized worlds - will hit productivity further. White collar workers will become more cooked. Big Tech firms are already hiring way less Gen Z workers. Many overly AI reliant kids can't do basic analysis. Maybe it's because covid messed everyone up. Who knows. The 'silver lining' of AI will be that it'll get good enough to replace a lot of white collar jobs. But the resulting performance will be kind of at par with the last generation of coherent people. So you'd rather hire Claude than a zoomer. But it will also kind of suck. But it's not like there will be zero ROI. There is $16.6 T of payroll. 10% will get cut. $1.6T of 'savings'. It won't be good for consumption. By the time it is clear that GDP won't accelerate, the bond market will start to go into free fall. The Fed will act. This will cause Gold to rip, getting the ultra rich thinking about capital flight. Meanwhile - we have a boom in on-chain tokenization. And it's not just "hey look there's an asset on a blockchain nobody users". The majority of the top 15 perps on Hyperliquid are stocks. Centralized exchanges are seeing booming volumes. The US government has repeatedly stated it wants more USD stablecoins. And the primary use case (at least by profit if not by transaction volume) of USD stablecoins is as collateral for perpetual swaps. This is rational. During periods of high inflation and debt uncertainty, backstopping large buyers of US treasuries such as Tether is smart. This push towards stablecoins will undermine the perceived sovereignty of Europe, who will develop CBDCs to compete in digital payments. AI coding will speed up CBDCs. The Norgesbank is vibe coding a CBDC right now. Claude is on the commits which are pouring in each day. CBDCs are unpopular right now because they put the government directly in charge of credit. Who are we kidding. The government is, and has been the lender of first resort since 2008. SVB was part 1 of the mask coming off. The narrative will be that regional banks are no longer suited for the AI economy. Once CBDCs launch there will be a second wave of tokenization. Right now it's a US phenomenon. But the US is ironically not the biggest beneficiary of tokenization because we have such liquid equity capital markets. Due to the mundane reason that it's efficient to move corporate finance on-chain. Fixed income will find its way onto mirrored assets on public chains. Foreign exchange is one of the largest retail markets on earth. There are virtually no non USD stables. That will change. Then there will be big, liquid FX markets and fixed income markets traded with leverage and looped on chain. Tokenized equities do not offer a much better UX than stocks on IBKR. Tokenized debt will be vastly better in terms of capital efficiency and UX. Corporate debt - I'd argue, is the single worst UX in all of finance. So what do I think is going to happen: Hopes will be crushed. The fiscal problems associated with surging yields will become front in center just as it becomes clear that the plan for dealing with them is not AGI but rather asset confiscation. Capital flight will accelerate. At the same time, unlike previous crypto bull runs - there will be a lot of corporate PMF that will drive fees across on-chain ecosystems, and improving tech that has been battle hardened from years of AI onslaughts just as the rest of the world is just realizing that all the encryption problems in crypto are problems everywhere else too Countries like Singapore, the UAE and Switzerland will capitalize on regulated trading of bearer assets. Capital will flow to these places both because of laws, and high personal safety risks associated with these things. Stocks are at parabolic highs versus crypto. The things I am saying are far from consensus. Right now, people view crypto as a failed financial Stanford Prison Experiment. Trad VCs ask for restructurings or to remove crypto investors from your cap tables. Even the big ones. There's public shaming. Most people have quit the space. One investor reached out to me. He seemed surprised I was still grinding. I guess everyone else spent investor money, checked out, rugged, or pivoted to AI. It's obviously not easy seeing your friends get rich. People around you questioning your sanity. "Believe in something" is what they used to say. Yea man. I'm not here because I believe. I'm here because I don't have faith in a failed system run by criminals. Metastasized discontent congealing into red candles. Faithless stares. Monotonous code reviews. Years of opportunity cost Nihilists who sold their dreams for bags of currency representing a system they despite that will never accept them no matter how many 'pivots' they have For me - it's just back to 2 simple questions. Question 1: We invested awesome amounts of money. Is everything awesome as a result? Question 2: Do you think the system that elevated Jeffrey Epstein to the pinnacle of society is going to let you become an immortal because of AI generated bio therapeutics? I know my answers. And I act accordingly. Do you?
144
181
78
1,610
353,392
Have you ever seen a Chevy with the butterfly door?
37