Tim Worstall (@worstall) profile picture

Freelance classical liberal around and about. Substack at https://xitter.cf/t.co/U6iYpigGfh

Sao Joao de Negrilhos Portugal
Joined October 2009
Photo by Tim Worstall (@worstall)Photo by Tim Worstall (@worstall)Photo by Tim Worstall (@worstall)Photo by Tim Worstall (@worstall)Photo by Tim Worstall (@worstall)Photo by Tim Worstall (@worstall)Photo by Tim Worstall (@worstall)Photo by Tim Worstall (@worstall)Photo by Tim Worstall (@worstall)Photo by Tim Worstall (@worstall)
Good point.
The Russians kill "eight people including a child" on an almost daily basis in Ukraine and I don't see you accusing them of genocide. Mariupol: 22,000 deaths. Gaza: 70,000. Population of Mariupol 425,000. Population of Gaza 2.1million. 5% of pop in Mariupol, 3.5% in Gaza.
3
1
18
758
Tim Worstall retweeted
Outstanding blog from The Secret Academic
5
13
111
10,365
Tim Worstall retweeted
Replying to @disco___cat
If you make things like alcohol or tobacco (or any other drugs, honestly) too expensive and/or illegal you will get huge black markets and the resulting organised crime that comes with them. Well, yes. This has always happened everywhere.
1
2
9
336
Tim Worstall retweeted
Anthropic is likely to be one of the most significant businesses in history. And yet if the CEO, Dario was British and the company was founded in the UK - he would not qualify for the government’s new Founders Relief scheme. That’s how bad it is.
18
21
5
233
31,752
Tim Worstall retweeted
“This austerity, is it in the room with us right now?”
👏 You can't cut your way to prosperity, because people pushed into poverty aren't productive. Two decades of austerity have destroyed the UK, its time to end the failed experiment & invest in our country again.
11
83
3
588
18,866
Tim Worstall retweeted
Given all the talk of reparations for slavery, it is useful (as it usually is) to take a look at what Adam Smith said on the matter. He thought it morally reprehensible, but his more interesting analysis lay in the economics: slavery was simply an inefficient economic institution. It reduced the size of the overall economic pie. While some could enrich themselves by its practice, many would be worse off and the net balance would be negative (because the size of the economic pie (think GDP as an approximation) would be smaller). Thus, while it is correct to think that involvement in the slave trade enriched some in Britain, it was negative for the Wealth of the Nation as a whole, and the growth thereof.* As to why such inefficiency has been a favoured practice so widely for so long, his answer was: "The pride of man makes him love to domineer, and nothing mortifies him so much as to be obliged to condescend to persuade his inferiors. Wherever the law allows it, and the nature of the work can afford it, therefore, he will generally prefer the service of slaves to that of freemen."
2
3
1
21
1,975
Tim Worstall retweeted
Replying to @worstall
Corporations cannot commit treason, nor be outlawed, nor excommunicated, for they have no souls.
1
2
305
Sigh. Corporation tax is incident upon shareholders in the first instance. Try to grasp a really basic point about taxation. There are only us humans here. Thus all tax comes out of the wallet of some - live - human. There's no one else to lose income from tax, is there? Companies do indeed hand over the cheque for corporation tax but corporation tax is not incident upon companies because companies are not live humans. No, being a legal person is not the same as being a natural person, don't try that one.
Part II. Furthermore, the argument does not work at all for people who are not directors of a company but simply shareholders who take a dividend income from the shares they have bought in CharlesReade Ltd. They simply pay the dividend rate of income tax on that income after the £500 tax allowance. The profits of CharlesReade will of course have been taxed. But not all those profits are distributed to shareholders and if corporation tax was set at zero by a future government the dividends paid might not be any more than they are now as the profits may be retained. People relying on returns on capital simply get the dividends they do not in any real sense pay the corporation tax as well. That is paid by the company.
6
4
92
3,703
Cancel That Oxfam Subscription, Right Now, by @worstall timworstall.substack.com/p/c… "Feeding the starving is a Godly, righteous thing to be doing. Whingeing about inequality to keep the grift going ain’t."
4
13
473
If you want more homes and hospitals why not just kill the laws that prevent people from building them?
Instead of building more AI data centers, which 66% of Americans oppose, I have a better idea. Let’s build 7 million affordable homes & apartments. Let’s build more hospitals, schools & childcare centers. Let’s create an economy that works for all, not just the top 1 percent.
3
25
612
Why aren't people in poverty productive? What's the working model here? Productivity is value of output divided by hours of labour. That's just what it is. Agreed, this works one way - people who are productive are not poor. But anyone care to explain this model trying to work the other way around?
👏 You can't cut your way to prosperity, because people pushed into poverty aren't productive. Two decades of austerity have destroyed the UK, its time to end the failed experiment & invest in our country again.
3
3
13
814
Fun thing. One of the best places to study commons rights, in that medieval farming sense, is Minchinhampton. Which was, yes, owned by David Ricardo. adamsmith.org/blog/lets-have… I would suspect - note, suspect, not know - that one of the commoners these days is @DaleVince which is also fun.
4
310
So, this disaster in South Africa. What's the polite explanation? We can't say race, obviously, can't say culture. Is it electing lefties? theguardian.com/world/2026/n… What is the allowable explanation for why the place is falling apart? (My own is something along the lines of the people who can run a successful revolution aren't those you'd want to run a place but mebbe that's just me)
35
11
3
98
27,880
How many arrests over $3 do you have to make before $3 crimes stop? After all, the societal loss of the captures and prosecutions is amortised over the total loss of the total number of crimes prevented, not just those caught.
The correct interpretation is that some people are willing to waste the time of six city workers to avoid paying $3 It will never be profitable to prosecute $3 crimes. But, society runs on a bunch of $3 transactions. So to have a society you have to arrest the guy stealing $3.
9
723
Reader: Portugal is not on the Mediterranean. "the Mediterranean diet".
Spent a week in Portugal breaking every rule the NHS ever gave. I ate eggs daily. I had steak. I ate local sardines, cheese and bacon. Nothing out of a packet with 47 ingredients. And I sat in the sun with no factor 50. I slept like a baby and my nervous system had a full factory reset. No supplements, no app, just sun and real food. Meanwhile the locals in their 80s were marching up hills I needed a sit-down after. People talk about the Mediterranean diet like it's all vegetables and olive oil. But the reality is grilled fish, pork, lamb, eggs, cheese, animal fat. And red wine. People walking everywhere, sitting in the sun, eating late and slowly with family, and having a nap when they felt like it. Nobody rushing, nobody grazing on "healthy snacks", nobody living on cortisol and a meal deal. That's why they live longer. Not because someone drizzled oil on a lettuce leaf. It's the whole way they live, and you can't sell that in a bottle at the supermarket.
4
1
10
2,142
Lorra money to be made out of piling it high and sellin' it cheap.
Rock has this right, and the numbers make it even better. Vanderbilt broke the steamboat monopolies by cutting the New York to Albany fare from $3 to 10 cents, then to free, and still profited on food sales. His Nicaragua route drove the New York to California fare from $600 to as low as $150. Rockefeller: kerosene cost 26 cents a gallon in 1870. By 1885 it was 8 cents. Light after dark stopped being a luxury for working families. Carnegie: steel rails ran about $160 a ton in the mid 1870s. By the late 1890s they were $17. Ford: a Model T cost $825 in 1908. By 1925 it was $260, and he doubled his workers' wages along the way. The pattern continues today. Jobs put computing power that once cost millions and filled a room into your pocket for a few hundred dollars. Gates put a computer on every desk and drove the price of software toward zero, and he did it decades before he took up preaching the morality of giving wealth away instead of the morality of creating it. Bezos cut the price of nearly everything you buy and delivers it to your door in a day. Musk cut the cost of reaching orbit by roughly 90 percent and forced the entire auto industry to build electric cars people want. Every man on this list got rich by making life cheaper for millions of people he never met. These fortunes were earned by lowering bills on a scale no government program would even claim to be able to match. And the fact is that such government programs ultimately have the complete opposite effect.
2
7
576
Tim Worstall retweeted
If an oligarch had used the Metropolitan Police and Carter Ruck to silence a journalist, would that be similarly brushed over and forgiven?
First the UK media buried its own role in Jason Arday’s death & then it white-washed it. This week, it celebrated it. Re-posting my piece from August because the de-humanisation continues. The UK press continues to fact check a corpse, while refusing to correct a single false claim 🔗 👇 1/
43
132
9
1,494
98,619
Tim Worstall retweeted
Who have I been fired by?! a) I don't work for the Telegraph b) I work for News UK. You know, the company that fired YOU? 🙃
And she wonders why she's been fired🦇🦇
73
190
13
1,997
60,495
I don't fear for the Telegraph at all. There's been a fatwa there against employing me for several years now. So, snigger.
I fear for the Telegraph. The new German owners are taking a wrecking ball to a fine journalistic institution by sacking 100 journalists ( despite saying they would invest) and pushing out the door the only names worth reading, the latest being the brave and super talented Alison Pearson. All in favour of cutting costs but what is their big idea? Some old nonsense about more foreign news (nobody will pay for that) and turning the Telegraph into a global behemoth. That definitely won’t happen. My advice is to take a tip from the financially successful Times; Invest heavily in journalism and journalists, disclose information not available elsewhere, keep your good writers fed and watered. I know there is nobody at the Telegraph, from the Editor downwards not concerned at their future and the future of the title. These are tough times for the media, not made easier by these owners destroying their own £600million investment and the enjoyment of their readers.
3
18
882