Victor Pak (@Victorfpak) header
Victor Pak (@Victorfpak) profile picture

Politiek journalist, Amerikakenner @ewmagazinenl en politicoloog.

Joined December 2009
Photo by Victor Pak (@Victorfpak)Photo by Victor Pak (@Victorfpak)Photo by Victor Pak (@Victorfpak)Photo by Victor Pak (@Victorfpak)Photo by Victor Pak (@Victorfpak)Photo by Victor Pak (@Victorfpak)Photo by Victor Pak (@Victorfpak)Photo by Victor Pak (@Victorfpak)Photo by Victor Pak (@Victorfpak)Photo by Victor Pak (@Victorfpak)
Vorige week reisde ik in het kielzog van l premier Schoof mee naar Rome. Een gesprek over de Haagse politiek die faalt, of Geert Wilders premier van Nederland kan zijn en zijn eigen toekomst. Geen Schoof-II, maar misschien wel memoires: ewmagazine.nl/nederland/acht…
1
3
14
4,510
Als het vorig kabinet dit had gezegd, was er (terecht) moord en brand geschreeuwd.
De Staatssecretaris volgt het advies van de RvS niet op, want hij is bang dat het “momentum” dan verloren gaat.
1
10
32
1,311
Victor Pak retweeted
Trump appointing the ultra-nationalist Stephen Miller as chief of staff certainly sends a signal—that the president is not in the mood for post-midterms compromise or retreat on nativism, immigration & cultural issues. And it makes it harder to imagine legislative compromises with a Democratic majority.
23
146
10
833
54,393
Been thinking about this for 12 hours and my main takeaway is that Vance is just far too terminally online. You're the sitting vice president. You don't get credit for reply-guying your own administration Unless Vance is going to resign and start a breakaway MAGA faction, stuff like this just reinforces his reputation for insincerity. It'll get a pat on the head from Don Jr. and Tucker but I can't imagine it plays well more broadly Also, notice what he doesn't mention. Tariffs. Corruption. AI/data centers. Exit polls said all of these were big issues for voters. Vance doesn't even nod to them. Even immigration enforcement gets only a straw-man reference to amnesty
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up. So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us." Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026. There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true. But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone. Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were: 1) End the war 2) Focus on cost of living/inflation 3) Put America First 4) Change our relationship to Israel Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.) In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you. The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night. If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest. But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there. I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
45
156
6
1,607
71,399
"What is the Republican Party? From its fundraising operations to its governing philosophy, it has become an organization built around and for one man, hollowed out over the past decade and purged of anyone or any idea independent of the current president. Any remaining attachment to free markets, limited government, the rule of law, a culture of life, or family values has been superseded by Trump’s own desires, impulses, enrichment, and peculiarities." thedispatch.com/newsletter/n…
9
36
4
84
14,348
Deze verkiezingsuitslag is slecht nieuws voor de generatie van Democraten zoals Harris en Newsom. Er zijn betere talenten in de partij als het gaat om 2028:
NYT estimates for how young voters (18-29) voted in Texas: 2024 President: Harris +2 2026 Senate: Talarico +50 nytimes.com/interactive/2026…
4
3
1
13
2,572
NYT estimates for how young voters (18-29) voted in Texas: 2024 President: Harris +2 2026 Senate: Talarico +50 nytimes.com/interactive/2026…
1
30
7
204
13,391
PRO bewijst zo vooral dat ze de Amerikaanse politiek niet zo goed begrijpen
Maar waarom El Sayed eruit lichten terwijl zijn marge juist relatief klein was en hij in swing state meegelift heeft op blue wave? Geen bijzondere prestatie oid. Zet er dan als PRO Talarico, Ossoff of desnoods AOC neer, maar dit is opzichtig moslimpronken want dat is progressief ofzo
1
3
13
1,584
RT @bopanc: Trump’s spirit lives on in the “first Muslim senator” who got elected after campaigning on faraway Gaza and Israel, wants to wo…
This quoted post is unavailable.
1
5
Slechtste return on investment ooit voor Musk:
Just thinking about the remarkable fact that Elon Musk will have dropped nearly a half a billion dollars on this election with no return... wow.
1
1
295
Victor Pak retweeted
'Het is de totempaal van deze verkiezingen, aldus @Victorfpak op NPO Radio 1 over de historische winst van de Democraten in Texas bij de midterms. 'Dat een Democraat wint in het hart van de Republikeinse partij is gigantisch.'
3
3
531
Victor Pak retweeted
If the remaining results go as expected, Democrats will hold governorships in states totaling 392 electoral votes.
345
3,002
420
28,233
2,842,277
Victor Pak retweeted
Met blauwe tsunami en senaatsoverwinningen in Texas, South Carolina, North Carolina, Kansas, Iowa en Ohio schudden Democraten PTSS van 2024 definitief van zich af. ewmagazine.nl/buitenland/202…
5
1
3
1,569
Victor Pak retweeted
This isn't a tsunami or anything like that. This is a complete collapse of the Republican coalition.
130
692
80
5,208
256,632
Agreed. I also have no sense of how Trump is going to go about these last two years, could be anything from a depressed and quiet has-been working on DC monuments full time to a completely unhinged lunatic torching everything.
There have been midterm bloodbaths before. And there have been unpopular albatross lame duck Presidents before. But I genuinely don't have any mental model for how 2028 GOP hopefuls (at any level) will talk to/about Trump.
4
10
3
96
8,020
Ook Maine maar de democraten, jarenlang was Collins immuun voor Trumps impopulariteit. Tot deze midterms.
Sen. Susan Collins has called Troy Jackson to concede, @ArletteSaenz reports.
228
Victor Pak retweeted
🚨 JUST IN: President Trump says the Democrats "did a good job" tonight "This fight's been going on for ages. I started [12 years] ago, and came up on top all the time." "I don't like to consider it a defeat for me. I wasn't on the ballot...nevertheless, I feel badly for a lot of very good Republicans...for them to lose is a tough thing." Dems did SO good, the GOP may not win the Senate until *2032* Let alone policy, HORRIBLE news for SCOTUS.
291
511
42
3,460
847,265
De ruzie, zeg maar gerust burgeroorlog, bij de Republikeinse partij gaat losbarsten. DeSantis begint vast:
Assuming Republicans lose the seats where prediction markets have the Democrats at 90+% to win, that would produce 55 Democrat Senate seats. Chance of confirming a worthy successor to Justice Thomas and/or Alito during President Trump’s term: Zero. Chance of confirming a worthy successor during a hypothetical GOP admin 2029-2033: probably zero (GOP won’t be able to recapture enough seats in 28).
1
22
9,400
De republikeinen maakten zich tot de partij van Trump en betalen daar vanavond de prijs voor. De democraten zijn terug in de Obama-era met veel jonge, gematigde kandidaten die winnen.
1
228
Victor Pak retweeted
Republicans lose Iowa, Kansas, Texas, South Carolina, Ohio and North Carolina. Maine and Alaska are at risk “This is a generational wipeout,” one senior Republican strategist told Semafor. “We are going to have a full-on GOP civil war.”  semafor.com/article/11/03/20…
14
90
17
503
103,462