People United for Privacy defends the right of every American to stand with the causes they believe in without fear of intimidation or retribution.

Washington, D.C.
Joined September 2018
When groups that speak about public policy are forced to expose their donors *and* their donors' donors, countless nonprofit voices self-censor to avoid a compliance nightmare. Beware "original source" disclosure: unitedforprivacy.com/donor-d…
2
1
74
People United for Privacy retweeted
In about two hours, I’ll be chatting with my colleagues Matt Nese and Alex Baiocco about their excellent analysis of the 2026 state legislative session for nonprofits and donors. Join us! events.zoom.us/ev/AtHaHh7JAQ…
2
3
54
People United for Privacy retweeted
I-194 won’t get money out of Montana politics. Wealthy donors and super PACs can still spend unlimited sums, while everyday Montanans lose the ability to pool their resources and speak out. This is a gift to the political elite. My op-ed in @bozchron. bozemandailychronicle.com/op…
1
3
6
261
Join us next week for a discussion about threats to nonprofit advocacy and donor privacy in the 2026 legislative session and beyond. events.zoom.us/ev/AtHaHh7JAQ…
1
35
What Nonprofits and Donors Need to Know From the 2026 State Legislative Session Join us virtually on October 14 to review the top threats and biggest opportunities facing nonprofit advocacy and donor privacy in the states. events.zoom.us/ev/AtHaHh7JAQ…
36
Can you imagine the civil rights movement without the NAACP? The gun rights movement without the NRA? A labor rights movement without unions? The "Corporate Power Reset" would eviscerate the role of private associations in American civic life. unitedforprivacy.com/the-cor…
1
1
1
132
Join us October 14 to hear all about the most important developments and trends for nonprofit donor privacy in the 2026 legislative session. Register now: events.zoom.us/ev/AtHaHh7JAQ…
1
1
55
People United for Privacy retweeted
We don't lose speech rights when we join together. Yet the "corporate power reset" would punish nonprofits, unions, and advocacy groups for speaking. Via @dcexaminer, @InstFreeSpeech's Tiffany Donnelly explains why it's censorship by another name: washingtonexaminer.com/resto…
3
3
69