Pinned Tweet
we announced Jev 1.14 on 10.14 at 1:14pm PT 🔥
a new and improved model, along with experimental features for our dreamers:
• images
• a new box type
• longer context
surprise, Jev was already able to see you! 👁️
BUT our bar for production-grade intelligence is quite high, so builders beware, these are preview features.
enter the ~*~ danger zone ~*~ at your own risk. 🚨
bespoke agents, with bespoke knowledge bases, bespoke instructions, bespoke tool-sets, and of course, bespoke routing with Jev
make your goon your very own!
It has been interesting to see all the applications of @typesafeai's Jev at @sanity_io.
Like our new internal agent harness which allows anyone in the company to quickly spin up a bespoke agent. Jev is used for the router and has worked pretty well so far!
We (@rostimelk, @even, and I) wrote up an in-depth post about how it's built so you can do it too.
sanity.io/engineering/how-we…
for trust issues, sometimes you need therapy
but your agents need a reliable code firewall, powered by Jev
Agents have a trust problem.
Today’s models can do most work. What they need is the right boundaries. In traditional software, those were set at build time. With agents, they have to be set and enforced at runtime.
Today we’re introducing Composio Firewall, the runtime boundary for agents.
Millions of users and developers already use Composio as the runtime for their agents - giving agents tools, auth, and sandboxed execution. Now with our agent firewall every action an agent takes is evaluated using Jev and custom SLMs tuned by Composio based on real-world usage data.
The firewall strengthens that existing boundary in both directions, checking the actions agents take and the information coming back to them through Composio.
The advantage of the runtime boundary is that Composio Firewall verifies that the agent respects user intent and the boundaries set by the developer and user. Additionally, this provides the safety layer required to protect the user against malicious prompt injection as well as other attacks.
Composio Firewall is live now for all Composio developers.
Check it out at composio.dev/firewall
Jev brings reliable intelligent judgment to @UiPath workflows, about an order of magnitude cheaper and faster
LLM-as-a-judge-no-more
Meet the @typesafeai connector in UiPath Integration Service. 🔗 Bring Jev models into your workflows to make fast, confident decisions at lower cost & latency: uipath.com/blog/product-and-…
let's be real, cookie banners were a terrible idea
what should get automated away next?
We put Jev inside the Lightpanda binary and built judge() on top of it. @typesafeai
No more sending a whole page to an LLM just to find out it's a cookie banner.
> Blocked pages, CAPTCHAs, cookie walls, logins, paywalls, error pages, empty searches and pages still loading can all return an HTTP 200
> judge() asks a set of predefined questions and tells you if the page has real content, and what kind: article, listing, product or docs
> One call, ~0.2s
In the video:
> 30 sites, ~14s total
> Lightpanda backs off when rate-limited, accepts cookie walls, and keeps or skips each page
the creativity and productivity coming out of @coderabbitai 's Jev hackathon was nuts.
lots of great tidbits in their video!
hmm maybe a benchmark is okay if it makes you hungry
Is this a hot dog?
find out what your favorite LLMs said over at hotdogbench.com
who benchmarks the benchmarkers?
a good eval is:
- ephemeral. it snapshots a moment in time and capabilities.
- grounded. it directly measures performance on tasks and data you care about.
- specific. it operates on the desired results and not some proxy of them.
take notes!
Typesafe's CEO @CompleteSkeptic does not trust public benchmarks.
Neither do I, Diogo.
So @p0 and I wrote a blog evaluating 8 decision models on real company training datasets we have personally audited and iterated on.
For what it's worth though, Jev is still on top 👑
parallel.ai/blog/are-all-sys…
(cmd-) f the world
indexing got you down?
can't find your keys?
f that. no really, f that
Jev's got your back
(demo replay for those who missed JevDay!)
our CEO @CompleteSkeptic tells the tale of Dr. Einstein and Mr. Bean
> if AI responds like Einstein 95% of the time and Mr. Bean 5% of the time, how are you going to automate anything with it?
@mattturck talks us through a wild first month of Jev
Crazy launch! Copycats! Massive round! On the one-month anniversary of the launch of Jev, we unpack it all with @CompleteSkeptic, CEO of @typesafeai: what Jev is, how it fixes what's broken in AI, and why the fast-followers are missing the hard part.
00:00 “95% Einstein, 5% Mr. Bean”
1:09 Why intelligence per dollar matters
3:25 Why TypeSafe built in stealth for two years
5:50 “We could have had AGI last year”
6:48 Why the product carries the marketing
9:33 What is Jev? Machine-native AI, built for software
10:53 System One vs. System Two
12:26 From simple decisions to composable AI
15:21 Automating email: giant prompts vs. smart if-statements
20:03 Probabilities, thresholds, and developer control
23:43 Why Jev is faster and cheaper than chat models
25:39 “Classification is AI-complete”
27:16 RLHF: how OpenAI trained models to please humans
31:28 Sycophancy, refusals, and the hidden costs of RLHF
34:22 RLVR: why benchmark gains don’t mean reliable automation
37:51 RLCD: optimizing for machine-native intelligence
39:54 Why TypeSafe builds its training data in-house
41:49 The Bitterest Lesson: define the task before scaling
44:39 Building Jev from open-weight models
45:56 Is Jev just a classifier? Why that’s a compliment
48:35 “Build prod, not God”
50:11 Embedding AI in software, beyond coding assistants
53:05 Jev’s copycats: matching the interface vs. the intelligence
55:33 Why benchmarks mislead the users they should help
58:37 Open weights vs. APIs: how TypeSafe weighs the tradeoff
1:00:04 Jevons paradox: a new market for machine intelligence
1:02:50 Why Diogo is skeptical of recursive self-improvement
1:04:47 Can practical automation avert an AI winter?
TypeSafe AI retweeted
Jev 1.14 is now on OpenRouter.
Per @typesafeai this release is "beautifully boring":
• Everything: a tiny bit better
• Multilingual: the biggest upgrade
• Multimodal: it can see now (experimental)
• Price: unchanged ($0.042/M input, output free)
• Drama: none
openrouter.ai/typesafe/jev-1…
TypeSafe AI retweeted
Filtering is the expensive half of a news digest. Every article needs a judgment call, and a judgment call has always meant an LLM call.
Not anymore. $0.00004 per article.
We teamed up with @n8n_io and built a weekday AI brief using @typesafeai's Jev. Now live on n8n blog as part of their Verified Node Spotlight. 🧵
funny, suddenly all of these dynamic designs, structured workflows, and knowledge task solutions are appearing faster and faster, as though it were dramatically easier to automate them.
wonder what happened 🤔
great work @Lovable
If your app doesn’t have AI features you’re ngmi
We made them simple to build: just ask Lovable.
Now powered by even more models from @claudeai, @firecrawl, @GeminiApp, @OpenAI, @perplexity_ai, @p0, and @typesafeai.
TypeSafe AI retweeted
Congrats @typesafeai
Jev images is here
One question about an image that is 850x850 cost one hundredth of a cent - $0.000096936
about 10,000 images for a dollar.
referencing the image more than once duplicates the token usage - so asking two questions in a single request is equivalent to uploading two images


























