Understanding the U.S.-China Competition A new RAND report out this week grapples with a fundamental question that will shape the world in the coming decades: What is the scope and nature of the U.S.-China competition? China is indeed a formidable U.S. competitor, but it is not poised to dominate world politics. "The competition is clearly something other than a classic power transition," the authors write. "China is rising relative to the U.S. but not in a straight-line trajectory." The report identifies seven areas of power and influence that provide a useful framework for understanding the competition. Science and technology and domestic economics stand out as the two most critical areas. The authors also note that this is a contest to prove which country's system best provides for its own people during a time of turbulence and instability. They also warn that, despite limits to China's rise, Beijing is approaching this contest through a comprehensive campaign, within and across many elements of national power. Meanwhile, the U.S. has yet to fully embrace the scope of the contest or invest sufficiently in critical tools of statecraft. This has many implications for U.S. strategy. For example, the contest for influence in global digital, AI, and energy networks must be an important focus of strategic investments. Washington should also seek to strengthen its existing global power alignments, which remain a huge advantage. And focusing more on homeland resilience issues could put the U.S. on better footing, whether in peacetime or war. In its competition with China, the U.S. must preserve its vital interests without blowing up the relationship. The most plausible end state, the authors write, "is to create the conditions that encourage and require China to constrain its ambitions and aggressiveness—to become not a friend or ally but a great power more capable of controlled coexistence."

How are insurers responding to various AI risks? New report: bit.ly/4ybanEY

What factors produce an advantage in the U.S-China competition for digital networks? New research: bit.ly/3Unbfb2

Steph Guerra leads RAND's portfolio of research at the intersection of AI and biotechnology. New Q&A: bit.ly/3TKFW9V

The race to artificial general intelligence should be like "shooting the rapids, not competing in a regatta," say RAND experts. 🎧 Learn more in a new episode of Policy Minded: bit.ly/3TTseRY

Cost, bundled ecosystems, and on-the-ground presence give China structural advantages in the global digital network competition—but the U.S. can still catch up. bit.ly/4yMODj1

Insurance offers an opportunity for firms to transfer AI-related risks. But AI losses do not map cleanly onto existing insurance categories. This new report explores the state of play: bit.ly/4d0qm0l

When considering the competition between the U.S. and China, the key question is not only which country leads in innovation, but which can more effectively spread technological advances throughout its economy. bit.ly/4y7Dybs

"We shouldn't rush into replacing workers with AI, and our tax code certainly shouldn't incentivize employers to do so." bit.ly/46qAGel

Millions of Americans report using psychedelics. And the policy landscape for these substances is changing rapidly. Learn more: bit.ly/4hYaVai

A new digital battleground is emerging. What critical factors produce advantage in the U.S.-China competition for digital networks? Our new report explores: bit.ly/4dGR0LT

What do we know about how students are using AI? How effective are schools' cell phone policies? And what do schools need to navigate these and other challenges? bit.ly/4AQqee7

Our new report on U.S. policy for increasing domestic access to critical minerals.👇 bit.ly/47wzK8t

Understanding diffusion capacity—a country's ability to effectively spread innovations through its economy—is important for assessing strategic competition between the U.S. and China. New report: bit.ly/4AQSCMX

What does an effective biosecurity strategy look like? RAND's Steph Guerra explains in this new Q&A: bit.ly/4zg7rHe

Competition for influence over digital networks—5G systems, AI infrastructure, fiber-optic cables—sits at the heart of the U.S.-China rivalry. New report: bit.ly/4ex5dvc

"Even as they're using it, [students are] thinking about the negative implications of outsourcing too much of their thinking to AI." bit.ly/3TALSlx

In a new episode of Policy Minded, RAND experts explain how to navigate uncertainty as the U.S. and China race toward artificial general intelligence. bit.ly/4daH2SV

How might the U.S. devise a strategy to counter China and gain strategic leverage? Our new report offers some recommendations: bit.ly/4dOE3j9

New report explores the emerging mismatch between rapid adoption of AI and the fragmented market for insuring (or not insuring) AI use: bit.ly/4cVdMPY

RAND's Shira Efron discusses Israel's deepening isolation and why history offers some reason for optimism of a reversal: nytimes.com/2026/10/09/opini…