Pinned Tweet
Check out the 6-Time #1 bestseller in Amazon! Logra Tu Dream logratudream.com/amazonrevie… #hispanicize #success #quote
Arturo Nava retweeted
I've faced plenty of vicious attacks throughout my journalism career, but nothing compares to the disgusting and sexually degrading attacks being leveled against me and my @DailyCaller colleagues for reporting honestly and fearlessly on Israeli influence and the deeply unpopular war with Iran.
But if you know anything about the Caller, you know we don't bow to bullies, pressure campaigns, or shameless attempts at cancellation.
Perhaps they're so upset because they assumed we were on their "team." They were wrong. The only team we're on is Team America.
And if they think this will change our coverage, they've badly misjudged us.
Arturo Nava retweeted
Israel thrives on chaos
They are the destabilizing force in this world that fights against all human decency.
Who knows what happens next but I don't see things getting better before they get a lot worse.
Good luck to us all
Long Live The Republic
Arturo Nava retweeted
🚨🚨EXCLUSIVE: TUCKER CARLSON’S NUCLEAR WAR WARNING CONFIRMED!🚨🚨
Nuclear War DEFCON Update: Former Head of The National Counterterrorism Center Joe Kent, Briefs The American People On Trump’s Reported Plans To Launch A Nuclear Strike Against Iran.
In this absolute must watch/share interview, Joe Kent gives his assessment of President Trump’s options concerning Iran, Russia, and the emerging rouge AI agent cyber threats now coming to a head.
The planet is facing a convergence of crises that if not properly handled, experts believe could trigger a civilization ending nuclear war.
Bottom Line: Humanity is now staring into the abyss of Armageddon and it’s time to get on our knees and pray to God.
Arturo Nava retweeted
So today for Trump’s closing midterm pitch he goes to the reflecting pool and brags all about working on the reflecting pool that 99.99999999999999% of Americans don’t care about and it has no effect on their lives like continued high inflation, high cost of living, high cost of gas/diesel does.
Then he is asked by a reporter if he’s going to bomb Iran after midterms and he says “no” but now it’s being reported that in the past few hours (evening before midterm elections) that we bombed an Iranian missile defense system on Qeshm island in southern Iran near the Strait of Hormuz.
Again a war most Americans do NOT support and has hurt Americans with high gas and diesel prices and a war Trump claims he’s won like 50 times, after promising no more foreign wars during the last election campaign.
Then he post a video promising to give every adult American a $5,000 check only if Republicans win, after failing to deliver the other promised DOGE and tariff checks to the American people.
And in the video he says if Democrats win we will go into a horrible recession because of Democrats, yet he’s been President for the past two years and will STILL BE President for two more years.
It’s all like listening to a really bad home salesman lying and making up ridiculous claims about a piece of crap product he’s selling as he refuses to leave your living room and you really regret letting him in the front door.
Hair and all.
And his campaign team, WH staff, and all Republican candidates desperate to win all stand there, applaud, and tell him, “great job Mr, President”
🤦♀️
Arturo Nava retweeted
JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon responds to fears of World War III, warns of a dangerous alignment between Russia, Iran, North Korea, and China, but says America has nothing to fear: “There’s no way America is weak.” 🇺🇸
“We already have multiple wars taking place, and people are partnering up like we’ve never had before. Russia, Iran, and North Korea are abetting a terrible war in Ukraine, conducting sabotage across Europe, and supporting attacks on Israel through proxies.
China isn’t part of that, but they’re on the wrong side of it. Their microelectronics and oil trade make our relationship very complex.
But I want to point out to the American public: I’m not afraid of China.
We have all the food and more energy than we need. They don’t. Our neighborhood is a beautiful place. The Atlantic, the Pacific, Canada, and Mexico. No wars. They have a very complex neighborhood.
Our GDP per person is $80,000. Theirs is $15,000. We have the best universities in the world. And we have freedom. People say we’re a decadent, weak, lazy nation.
There’s no way America is weak. We’re not weak or lazy. But we are a little stupid and uncoordinated. We have to get our act together on China, trade, and immigration.
All America has to do is make sure we’re strong. Build our national economic power and military power. We don’t have to be afraid of China. The stronger we are, the better position we’re in.”
Arturo Nava retweeted
These insane grocery store cyberattacks in Europe show how this ultra connectivity is leaving large systems vulnerable.
We’ve gotten out of balance with technology and Ai.
I see a re-evolution towards a more analog life, coming quicker every day.
Arturo Nava retweeted
We are part of something so awe inspiring.
We were taught that Earth orbits the Sun in a closed circle. In reality, Earth has never returned to the same point in space once in 4.5 billion years.
Right now, the Sun is carrying Earth and every planet around the center of the Milky Way at 230 km/s (828,000 km/h), more than 18,000 kilometers every 80 seconds.
Because the Solar System is tilted 60.2° to the galactic plane and bobs up and down through the galactic disc roughly every 30 million years, the planets trace open 3D corkscrew helices across deep space rather than flat loops.
The last time the Sun stood where it stands today, one Galactic Year (230 million years) ago, the very first dinosaurs were only beginning to appear on Earth. Since forming 4.6 billion years ago, our Sun has completed only 20 laps.
Arturo Nava retweeted
Trump would be committing crimes against humanity. And so would everyone who goes along with this.
This cannot be allowed.
Under pressure from Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the Trump administration may be within days of launching a nuclear strike on Iran. The target would be Pickax Mountain in central Iran, where Israeli intelligence claims the Iranian government has restarted its nuclear enrichment program. No conventional weapon in the American arsenal can penetrate 300 feet of solid granite to destroy the tunnels where enrichment is supposedly taking place. The only military option is a nuclear strike. Netanyahu has been pushing hard for one. “Bibi calls Trump about it every day,” says an informed observer.
Netanyahu is cornered and desperate. After last week’s election results, he can’t form a government unless Trump intervenes directly in Israeli politics and brokers a deal with other parties that gives Netanyahu 61 seats in the Knesset. Otherwise, he is out as prime minister and on his way to ignominy, investigations and possibly jail. Netanyahu must stay close to Trump. He needs this war.
To that end, he’s applied maximum pressure to his closest allies in the administration, including Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and CENTCOM commander Brad Cooper. Both oppose a negotiated settlement to the war they’ve so grievously mismanaged; both are pushing to restart major combat operations. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and CIA director John Ratcliffe are also following Netanyahu’s lead, as are leaders of the Democratic Party. In a recent meeting on the subject, former president Barack Obama said he opposes the current Iran peace deal being drafted in Doha.
The rest of America’s longtime allies in the Middle East are terrified by the prospect of more war. On September 27th, Netanyahu flew secretly to Abu Dhabi to enlist the UAE in his lobbying effort for a final attack on Iran. The Emiratis refused. After eight months of conflict, Gulf economies are teetering. So are global energy and fertilizer markets. They won’t recover soon. Globally, there are a total of about 850 supertankers used to transport oil from producers to the rest of the world. In October alone, 11 of them were badly damaged in Hormuz. At this pace, a global depression is imminent. A nuclear strike would radically accelerate the destruction. Fallout from a ground explosion at Pickax Mountain would contaminate the Persian Gulf, poisoning the water supply for 100 million people.
And those are just some of the immediate consequences for the region. The rest of the world is every bit as exposed. No country other than the United States has ever used a nuclear weapon in war. Some would like to. An American nuclear attack on Iran would set a new precedent. The Russians have already told at least two other governments that an American nuclear strike on Iran would free them to use nuclear weapons against Ukraine. Pakistan and India would be tempted to do the same against each other, as would North Korea against Seoul. After the first nuclear strike, World War Three is inevitable. That war would be short and final.
We’ve been sleepwalking toward this moment for months. Since February, the administration has quietly rewritten America’s nuclear doctrine to make first use of so-called “battlefield nukes” easier and therefore more likely. No one in Washington in either party seems bothered by this. Now we’re on the brink of it.
Close observers say Trump is likely to decide by next weekend whether or not to use nuclear weapons. That would be November 7, six days from now. To his credit, he’s hesitating. At the moment, Trump is listening to his vice president, JD Vance, and to his envoy and friend Steve Witkoff, both of whom argue a deal with Iran can be made.
They’re right, though it won’t be simple. The Iranians are famously frustrating to negotiate with under any circumstances, and elements of that government have become more radical since Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his family were killed in February. After decades of isolation, even relatively moderate Iranian leaders seem confused by how decisions are made in the West. (There is a widespread belief in Tehran, for example, that the United States government controls Israel.) But overall, people who have spoken to decision-makers in Iran say there is consensus there that more war is bad for everyone and a deal is worth making.
One group that hasn’t been consulted so far is the global population — the hundreds of millions of people who will be killed along with their children if Trump is pushed by Netanyahu into launching a nuclear strike next week. Now would be the time for them to speak up.
Arturo Nava retweeted
"the plan is for either Iran or china to retaliate after Iran is struck with a nuclear weapon, at that point there will be limited nuclear exchange in the middle east followed by ceasefire"
Under pressure from Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the Trump administration may be within days of launching a nuclear strike on Iran. The target would be Pickax Mountain in central Iran, where Israeli intelligence claims the Iranian government has restarted its nuclear enrichment program. No conventional weapon in the American arsenal can penetrate 300 feet of solid granite to destroy the tunnels where enrichment is supposedly taking place. The only military option is a nuclear strike. Netanyahu has been pushing hard for one. “Bibi calls Trump about it every day,” says an informed observer.
Netanyahu is cornered and desperate. After last week’s election results, he can’t form a government unless Trump intervenes directly in Israeli politics and brokers a deal with other parties that gives Netanyahu 61 seats in the Knesset. Otherwise, he is out as prime minister and on his way to ignominy, investigations and possibly jail. Netanyahu must stay close to Trump. He needs this war.
To that end, he’s applied maximum pressure to his closest allies in the administration, including Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and CENTCOM commander Brad Cooper. Both oppose a negotiated settlement to the war they’ve so grievously mismanaged; both are pushing to restart major combat operations. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and CIA director John Ratcliffe are also following Netanyahu’s lead, as are leaders of the Democratic Party. In a recent meeting on the subject, former president Barack Obama said he opposes the current Iran peace deal being drafted in Doha.
The rest of America’s longtime allies in the Middle East are terrified by the prospect of more war. On September 27th, Netanyahu flew secretly to Abu Dhabi to enlist the UAE in his lobbying effort for a final attack on Iran. The Emiratis refused. After eight months of conflict, Gulf economies are teetering. So are global energy and fertilizer markets. They won’t recover soon. Globally, there are a total of about 850 supertankers used to transport oil from producers to the rest of the world. In October alone, 11 of them were badly damaged in Hormuz. At this pace, a global depression is imminent. A nuclear strike would radically accelerate the destruction. Fallout from a ground explosion at Pickax Mountain would contaminate the Persian Gulf, poisoning the water supply for 100 million people.
And those are just some of the immediate consequences for the region. The rest of the world is every bit as exposed. No country other than the United States has ever used a nuclear weapon in war. Some would like to. An American nuclear attack on Iran would set a new precedent. The Russians have already told at least two other governments that an American nuclear strike on Iran would free them to use nuclear weapons against Ukraine. Pakistan and India would be tempted to do the same against each other, as would North Korea against Seoul. After the first nuclear strike, World War Three is inevitable. That war would be short and final.
We’ve been sleepwalking toward this moment for months. Since February, the administration has quietly rewritten America’s nuclear doctrine to make first use of so-called “battlefield nukes” easier and therefore more likely. No one in Washington in either party seems bothered by this. Now we’re on the brink of it.
Close observers say Trump is likely to decide by next weekend whether or not to use nuclear weapons. That would be November 7, six days from now. To his credit, he’s hesitating. At the moment, Trump is listening to his vice president, JD Vance, and to his envoy and friend Steve Witkoff, both of whom argue a deal with Iran can be made.
They’re right, though it won’t be simple. The Iranians are famously frustrating to negotiate with under any circumstances, and elements of that government have become more radical since Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his family were killed in February. After decades of isolation, even relatively moderate Iranian leaders seem confused by how decisions are made in the West. (There is a widespread belief in Tehran, for example, that the United States government controls Israel.) But overall, people who have spoken to decision-makers in Iran say there is consensus there that more war is bad for everyone and a deal is worth making.
One group that hasn’t been consulted so far is the global population — the hundreds of millions of people who will be killed along with their children if Trump is pushed by Netanyahu into launching a nuclear strike next week. Now would be the time for them to speak up.
Arturo Nava retweeted
This is exactly why the demons removed Charlie Kirk from the playing field.
Tucker @TuckerCarlson Candace @RealCandaceO and a handful of other corragious souls are civilization’s last thin red line of sanity against a global demonic peverted will to destroy all life.
We must not empower these demonic forces one scintilla further.
Or we may not live to regret it.
Under pressure from Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the Trump administration may be within days of launching a nuclear strike on Iran. The target would be Pickax Mountain in central Iran, where Israeli intelligence claims the Iranian government has restarted its nuclear enrichment program. No conventional weapon in the American arsenal can penetrate 300 feet of solid granite to destroy the tunnels where enrichment is supposedly taking place. The only military option is a nuclear strike. Netanyahu has been pushing hard for one. “Bibi calls Trump about it every day,” says an informed observer.
Netanyahu is cornered and desperate. After last week’s election results, he can’t form a government unless Trump intervenes directly in Israeli politics and brokers a deal with other parties that gives Netanyahu 61 seats in the Knesset. Otherwise, he is out as prime minister and on his way to ignominy, investigations and possibly jail. Netanyahu must stay close to Trump. He needs this war.
To that end, he’s applied maximum pressure to his closest allies in the administration, including Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and CENTCOM commander Brad Cooper. Both oppose a negotiated settlement to the war they’ve so grievously mismanaged; both are pushing to restart major combat operations. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and CIA director John Ratcliffe are also following Netanyahu’s lead, as are leaders of the Democratic Party. In a recent meeting on the subject, former president Barack Obama said he opposes the current Iran peace deal being drafted in Doha.
The rest of America’s longtime allies in the Middle East are terrified by the prospect of more war. On September 27th, Netanyahu flew secretly to Abu Dhabi to enlist the UAE in his lobbying effort for a final attack on Iran. The Emiratis refused. After eight months of conflict, Gulf economies are teetering. So are global energy and fertilizer markets. They won’t recover soon. Globally, there are a total of about 850 supertankers used to transport oil from producers to the rest of the world. In October alone, 11 of them were badly damaged in Hormuz. At this pace, a global depression is imminent. A nuclear strike would radically accelerate the destruction. Fallout from a ground explosion at Pickax Mountain would contaminate the Persian Gulf, poisoning the water supply for 100 million people.
And those are just some of the immediate consequences for the region. The rest of the world is every bit as exposed. No country other than the United States has ever used a nuclear weapon in war. Some would like to. An American nuclear attack on Iran would set a new precedent. The Russians have already told at least two other governments that an American nuclear strike on Iran would free them to use nuclear weapons against Ukraine. Pakistan and India would be tempted to do the same against each other, as would North Korea against Seoul. After the first nuclear strike, World War Three is inevitable. That war would be short and final.
We’ve been sleepwalking toward this moment for months. Since February, the administration has quietly rewritten America’s nuclear doctrine to make first use of so-called “battlefield nukes” easier and therefore more likely. No one in Washington in either party seems bothered by this. Now we’re on the brink of it.
Close observers say Trump is likely to decide by next weekend whether or not to use nuclear weapons. That would be November 7, six days from now. To his credit, he’s hesitating. At the moment, Trump is listening to his vice president, JD Vance, and to his envoy and friend Steve Witkoff, both of whom argue a deal with Iran can be made.
They’re right, though it won’t be simple. The Iranians are famously frustrating to negotiate with under any circumstances, and elements of that government have become more radical since Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his family were killed in February. After decades of isolation, even relatively moderate Iranian leaders seem confused by how decisions are made in the West. (There is a widespread belief in Tehran, for example, that the United States government controls Israel.) But overall, people who have spoken to decision-makers in Iran say there is consensus there that more war is bad for everyone and a deal is worth making.
One group that hasn’t been consulted so far is the global population — the hundreds of millions of people who will be killed along with their children if Trump is pushed by Netanyahu into launching a nuclear strike next week. Now would be the time for them to speak up.
Arturo Nava retweeted
I am not saying I know that what Tucker is saying to be fully accurate, but the data points in support of it are starting to pile up and it’s becoming hard to ignore.
Regardless, it needs to unequivocally be stated that the United States is opposed to any preemptive nuclear strikes, ever, period. Even the hint we would consider it is insane and demonic. Any country or leader on the planet that would suggest this to us is not our ally.
Every elected leader at every level in our country from your local school board to your state legislature, governors, Congress, our Vice President, and everyone in between should be publicly issuing statements condemning nuclear escalation whenever it is hinted at.
Any influencer or person with a platform who doesn’t unconditionally oppose the preemptive use of nuclear weapons should be shamed from society, unfollowed, voted out, and not taken seriously.
We have nothing to gain with nuclear strikes and everything to lose.
History, if it continues, will not look kindly on those who stay silent.
Under pressure from Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the Trump administration may be within days of launching a nuclear strike on Iran. The target would be Pickax Mountain in central Iran, where Israeli intelligence claims the Iranian government has restarted its nuclear enrichment program. No conventional weapon in the American arsenal can penetrate 300 feet of solid granite to destroy the tunnels where enrichment is supposedly taking place. The only military option is a nuclear strike. Netanyahu has been pushing hard for one. “Bibi calls Trump about it every day,” says an informed observer.
Netanyahu is cornered and desperate. After last week’s election results, he can’t form a government unless Trump intervenes directly in Israeli politics and brokers a deal with other parties that gives Netanyahu 61 seats in the Knesset. Otherwise, he is out as prime minister and on his way to ignominy, investigations and possibly jail. Netanyahu must stay close to Trump. He needs this war.
To that end, he’s applied maximum pressure to his closest allies in the administration, including Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and CENTCOM commander Brad Cooper. Both oppose a negotiated settlement to the war they’ve so grievously mismanaged; both are pushing to restart major combat operations. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and CIA director John Ratcliffe are also following Netanyahu’s lead, as are leaders of the Democratic Party. In a recent meeting on the subject, former president Barack Obama said he opposes the current Iran peace deal being drafted in Doha.
The rest of America’s longtime allies in the Middle East are terrified by the prospect of more war. On September 27th, Netanyahu flew secretly to Abu Dhabi to enlist the UAE in his lobbying effort for a final attack on Iran. The Emiratis refused. After eight months of conflict, Gulf economies are teetering. So are global energy and fertilizer markets. They won’t recover soon. Globally, there are a total of about 850 supertankers used to transport oil from producers to the rest of the world. In October alone, 11 of them were badly damaged in Hormuz. At this pace, a global depression is imminent. A nuclear strike would radically accelerate the destruction. Fallout from a ground explosion at Pickax Mountain would contaminate the Persian Gulf, poisoning the water supply for 100 million people.
And those are just some of the immediate consequences for the region. The rest of the world is every bit as exposed. No country other than the United States has ever used a nuclear weapon in war. Some would like to. An American nuclear attack on Iran would set a new precedent. The Russians have already told at least two other governments that an American nuclear strike on Iran would free them to use nuclear weapons against Ukraine. Pakistan and India would be tempted to do the same against each other, as would North Korea against Seoul. After the first nuclear strike, World War Three is inevitable. That war would be short and final.
We’ve been sleepwalking toward this moment for months. Since February, the administration has quietly rewritten America’s nuclear doctrine to make first use of so-called “battlefield nukes” easier and therefore more likely. No one in Washington in either party seems bothered by this. Now we’re on the brink of it.
Close observers say Trump is likely to decide by next weekend whether or not to use nuclear weapons. That would be November 7, six days from now. To his credit, he’s hesitating. At the moment, Trump is listening to his vice president, JD Vance, and to his envoy and friend Steve Witkoff, both of whom argue a deal with Iran can be made.
They’re right, though it won’t be simple. The Iranians are famously frustrating to negotiate with under any circumstances, and elements of that government have become more radical since Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his family were killed in February. After decades of isolation, even relatively moderate Iranian leaders seem confused by how decisions are made in the West. (There is a widespread belief in Tehran, for example, that the United States government controls Israel.) But overall, people who have spoken to decision-makers in Iran say there is consensus there that more war is bad for everyone and a deal is worth making.
One group that hasn’t been consulted so far is the global population — the hundreds of millions of people who will be killed along with their children if Trump is pushed by Netanyahu into launching a nuclear strike next week. Now would be the time for them to speak up.
Arturo Nava retweeted
Tucker has dropped a thermonuclear truth bomb that should freeze the blood of every sane soul still breathing: under relentless pressure from Bibi Netanyahu and his Third Temple death cultists (the messianic fanatics hell bent on apocalyptic fireworks to usher in their end times temple) the Trump admin stands days away from authorizing a nuclear strike on Iran’s Pickax Mountain.
Tucker, wired deep into the Trump inner circle like few others, I don't believe is speculating. This is the Empire of Chaos teetering on the edge of global suicide, with Netanyahu’s desperate political survival demanding radioactive Armageddon while Trump reveals himself as weaker and more compromised than even Professor @s_m_marandi and other clear eyed observers have long warned.
The entire bloody charade in the Middle East remains an illegal war of aggression, a neocon Zionist racket that has already bled the region dry, yet this latest escalation further exposes the farce of Trump's “America First.” Trump, once laughably billed as the great disruptor, now hesitates only under Vance and Witkoff’s subpar counsel while Netanyahu calls daily, his cultist allies in the administration and across parties salivating at the prospect of battlefield nukes and the precedent that would ignite WWIII.
We are watching the final hours of a decision that will not stay contained inside any mountain in Iran. A nuclear first use does not end a war; it ends the last argument against nuclear world war. Netanyahu needs this strike to stay out of prison. The cultists around him need it for reasons that have nothing to do with American security. And Trump, has so far proven too weak or too compromised to shut the door. History will not record the excuses. It will record whether he used the power he still holds to act like a real leader, or surrendered it to men who have already decided the world is worth burning.
Under pressure from Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the Trump administration may be within days of launching a nuclear strike on Iran. The target would be Pickax Mountain in central Iran, where Israeli intelligence claims the Iranian government has restarted its nuclear enrichment program. No conventional weapon in the American arsenal can penetrate 300 feet of solid granite to destroy the tunnels where enrichment is supposedly taking place. The only military option is a nuclear strike. Netanyahu has been pushing hard for one. “Bibi calls Trump about it every day,” says an informed observer.
Netanyahu is cornered and desperate. After last week’s election results, he can’t form a government unless Trump intervenes directly in Israeli politics and brokers a deal with other parties that gives Netanyahu 61 seats in the Knesset. Otherwise, he is out as prime minister and on his way to ignominy, investigations and possibly jail. Netanyahu must stay close to Trump. He needs this war.
To that end, he’s applied maximum pressure to his closest allies in the administration, including Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and CENTCOM commander Brad Cooper. Both oppose a negotiated settlement to the war they’ve so grievously mismanaged; both are pushing to restart major combat operations. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and CIA director John Ratcliffe are also following Netanyahu’s lead, as are leaders of the Democratic Party. In a recent meeting on the subject, former president Barack Obama said he opposes the current Iran peace deal being drafted in Doha.
The rest of America’s longtime allies in the Middle East are terrified by the prospect of more war. On September 27th, Netanyahu flew secretly to Abu Dhabi to enlist the UAE in his lobbying effort for a final attack on Iran. The Emiratis refused. After eight months of conflict, Gulf economies are teetering. So are global energy and fertilizer markets. They won’t recover soon. Globally, there are a total of about 850 supertankers used to transport oil from producers to the rest of the world. In October alone, 11 of them were badly damaged in Hormuz. At this pace, a global depression is imminent. A nuclear strike would radically accelerate the destruction. Fallout from a ground explosion at Pickax Mountain would contaminate the Persian Gulf, poisoning the water supply for 100 million people.
And those are just some of the immediate consequences for the region. The rest of the world is every bit as exposed. No country other than the United States has ever used a nuclear weapon in war. Some would like to. An American nuclear attack on Iran would set a new precedent. The Russians have already told at least two other governments that an American nuclear strike on Iran would free them to use nuclear weapons against Ukraine. Pakistan and India would be tempted to do the same against each other, as would North Korea against Seoul. After the first nuclear strike, World War Three is inevitable. That war would be short and final.
We’ve been sleepwalking toward this moment for months. Since February, the administration has quietly rewritten America’s nuclear doctrine to make first use of so-called “battlefield nukes” easier and therefore more likely. No one in Washington in either party seems bothered by this. Now we’re on the brink of it.
Close observers say Trump is likely to decide by next weekend whether or not to use nuclear weapons. That would be November 7, six days from now. To his credit, he’s hesitating. At the moment, Trump is listening to his vice president, JD Vance, and to his envoy and friend Steve Witkoff, both of whom argue a deal with Iran can be made.
They’re right, though it won’t be simple. The Iranians are famously frustrating to negotiate with under any circumstances, and elements of that government have become more radical since Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his family were killed in February. After decades of isolation, even relatively moderate Iranian leaders seem confused by how decisions are made in the West. (There is a widespread belief in Tehran, for example, that the United States government controls Israel.) But overall, people who have spoken to decision-makers in Iran say there is consensus there that more war is bad for everyone and a deal is worth making.
One group that hasn’t been consulted so far is the global population — the hundreds of millions of people who will be killed along with their children if Trump is pushed by Netanyahu into launching a nuclear strike next week. Now would be the time for them to speak up.
Arturo Nava retweeted
Nuclear is not a joker. There are some things it can do. Others it cannot. This is a very hard problem.
Yield won’t do it. The weapon needs to penetrate the rock first and then detonate. A 300kt (10X Hiroshima) detonated 3m into the rock may or may not generate enough seismic force to destroy the facilities buried more than 100m underneath.
It really depends on the specific geology of that particular rock formation. Even with a full geological work up, you still couldn’t be sure of destroying it.
What you could be sure about is that the fallout and radiation would be massive, precisely because the weapon must detonate close to the surface.
In terms of disabling usage of the site, the MOP (GBU-57) may be just as effective, with none of the nuclear and geopolitical fallout; above all, the nuclear destruction that is certain to follow in Ukraine.
There is no case for nuking Pickaxe. This is just a bullshit plant to intimidate the Iranians.
… yeah, pretty much.
Pickaxe is buried under like 100m of granite, and given its sheer size, it’s entirely unclear if GBU-57s would accomplish much of anything.
It’s also not like Fordow with its obvious cooling vents, Pickaxe has maybe one obvious weak-point (3rd image), and that appears to have been plugged with concrete.
Arturo Nava retweeted
Every public relations class should be studying this. An absolute masterclass in how to handle the media.
Arturo Nava retweeted
PUBLIC NOTICE: As I'm about to release a new interactive knowledge base system toward the end of this month, which distills knowledge from content sources and makes it available to users in an AI-like prompting format (but without using a GPU, and running at > 1,000 tokens / second output speed), I am calling for any publisher who has a large corpus of content (articles, transcripts, papers, etc.) and who wants to be included and CITED with clickable URLs in this tool, to contact me if you'd like your content included. (No DMs on this platform, please, you'll need to reach me through my producer, or mutual contacts we both know.)
I am already reaching out to Sayer Ji and Dr. Chris Martenson to see if they want their content included. (I won't include it without their permission.) It can also be a collection of podcast or interview transcripts in text format. My system will handle the normalization and distillation.
This will be a very popular tool that I am expecting to attract at least one million users, and that might be on the low side given the very positive response so far. If you want your content included, please find a way to reach me.
This tool is very heavily informed on preparedness, survival, nutrition, natural medicine, home food production and similar topics. It REPLACES all mainstream search engines and AI engines and has ZERO bias from big pharma or big tech. (Literally zero.)
The tool will be FREE to all users, and readily downloadable and sharable, as with all my platforms. :-)
Arturo Nava retweeted
🚨🚨Trump is preparing to launch a NUCLEAR sneak attack against Iran!
🚨🚨My research and sources confirm that Tucker Carlson is 100% correct that President Trump is seriously considering the use of nuclear weapons against Iran’s enrichment sites.
🚨🚨The science is horrifyingly clear, when you bomb weapons grade uranium with a nuclear weapon, it creates a radioactive cloud hundreds of times more deadly than Chernobyl.
🚨🚨if Trump gives a green light for launching a offensive nuclear strike on ANY country, his cabinet must immediately remove him via the 25th amendment.
🚨🚨The nuclear armed nation of Pakistan has also threatened to nuke Israel if any nuclear sneak attack is launched on Iran..
Will Republicans get crushed next week? Could there be a third party president in 2028? Is James Talarico the creepiest man alive? We answer these and other questions in this midterm edition of Ask Tucker.
0:00 Intro
0:32 Should We Give the Republicans One Last Chance?
2:07 Tucker's Thoughts on James Talarico
3:30 What Are the Chances of Forming a Third Party?
5:31 Will Democrats Winning Have Any Effect on the Wars in Iran and Russia?
9:38 Who Are the Three Best and Three Worst Politicians?
13:48 How Does the Donor Class Control Politicians?
20:03 Is Socialism Gaining Traction?
25:17 What Does Charlie Kirk's Murder Mean for the Future of the Republican Party?
31:39 Will We See a Blue Wave of Islamists and Marxists?
34:29 What Would the Midterms Look Like Without the Iran War?
38:45 Will Uncle Buck Run for President?
40:40 Why Is Trump Pushing Data Centers?
Arturo Nava retweeted
When the defence industry normies are freaking out, its a big problem.
If a nuclear weapon were used on Pick Axe mountain in Iran by the US or Israel or an empty field in Ukraine by Russia etc, it doesn’t matter, it would open up Pandora’s box and would make the U.S. and the world dramatically less safe. This isn’t even a question of how big of a disaster the use, in any manner, of a nuclear weapon would be. It would represent the largest foreign policy error ever by the United States if we were involved. We can only hope this claim isn’t accurate in any way.
Arturo Nava retweeted
If a nuclear weapon were used on Pick Axe mountain in Iran by the US or Israel or an empty field in Ukraine by Russia etc, it doesn’t matter, it would open up Pandora’s box and would make the U.S. and the world dramatically less safe. This isn’t even a question of how big of a disaster the use, in any manner, of a nuclear weapon would be. It would represent the largest foreign policy error ever by the United States if we were involved. We can only hope this claim isn’t accurate in any way.
Arturo Nava retweeted
here's the entirety of the seeming mental breakdown Haley Stevens just had on CNN. One of the most bizarre and incoherent political interviews I can recall. Note how she's completely unable to explain why she changed her mind from supporting Abdul El-Sayed last night to endorsing Mike Rogers today.