Liberty Evaluation retweeted
In solidarity with the young 15 year old lad arrested for sharing this image of a politician.
You know what to do people. Let’s flood X with this.
Liberty Evaluation retweeted
First, Zucman claims billionaires have “no incentive to move” because the tax is “one-time” and is owed based on residency as of January 1, 2026.
Yet, as we document, seven billionaires publicly left California before the January 1, 2026, snapshot date. These seven departures alone represent 30% of the state’s billionaire wealth.
Reality has unfortunately not consulted Zucman’s model. 2/14
Liberty Evaluation retweeted
Gabriel Zucman @gabriel_zucman has now for the third time criticized our research on California’s proposed billionaire tax, claiming we have provided “no answer” to his criticisms.
xitter.cf/gabriel_zucman/status/…
We have actually already responded twice on this platform, but let’s address his arguments once more in detail, with the hope that third time’s the charm. 1/14
This Hoover Institution study, which has fueled the deluge of ads (more than $200 million spent by billionaires so far) to defeat the California billionaire tax, is spectacularly misleading.
Let me explain its crucial flaw. 🧵
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Zucman argues that the tax will raise his projected revenue because billionaires who leave CA after 1/1/26 will be taxed anyway.
At least $542B of net worth (Page, Brin, Thiel) departed the state by 12/31/25.
The entire thread is a misleading denial of this fact.
ft.com/content/d66976…
nytimes.com/2026/04/27/us/…
forbes.com/sites/forbeswe…
Liberty Evaluation retweeted
🧵In 2019, California billionaire tax crusader Gabriel Zucman made an astonishing claim to the NY Times: billionaires pay a lower avg tax rate than poor people in the US.
I noticed something fishy though: Zucman's NYT chart did not match his own published data from a 2018 paper
Because entrepreneurs think long term. They know the one time wealth tax is the first step in a long line of policies designed to pillage American’s private property
Replying to @gabriel_zucman
The key problem is this:
Why would billionaires permanently leave California in response to a one-time tax owed if they lived there on January 1, 2026?
It would only make sense for them to leave if the tax becomes annual.
But if the tax becomes annual, it would also generate revenue annually — by virtue of, well, being annual.
One of the great absurdities is taxing unrealized capital gains
Replying to @gabriel_zucman
Californians are currently voting on a one-time 5% billionaire tax: Proposition 40.
This is a unique opportunity to start addressing one of the great absurdities of our time —that billionaires pay so little in taxes.
If it passes, it could kickstart the movement for a national billionaire tax and inspire similar initiatives other countries.
This is how we move from 19th century charity to 21st century democracy.
How did we convince generations that governments working within their budgets is a bad thing?
A nice old building burns, and so the pearl-clutching begins. Where were these pearl clutchers when austerity was wrecking a generation? Why does one town hall grab their attention but millions of schools, hospitals, and homes dilapidated by neoliberalism are of no importance?
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
France's level of public social spending was third highest in the world at 30.6% of GDP in 2024. Excluding the pandemic, it is slightly down from its 31.9% high in 2014. Total public spending is 57.2%, second highest among large countries not at war and near all-time highs.
ourworldindata.org/grapher/social…
ourworldindata.org/grapher/histor…
Maybe it’s not the inequality that breeds violence, but rather the morally bankrupt ideology spread by politicians and professors that tells people to envy and hate those who increase value in the marketplace
I don't approve at all of the insane violence on the streets of France and this, on both sides (demonstrators *and* police). But in our age of staggering inequality and utter powerlessness of middle classes around the world, we can always count on the French to remind the world that the *people* is actually what counts most. You can have various moguls, oligarchs, and billionaires-soon-to-be trillionaires fool themselves into believing they are safe and protected, but if the people get too angry, French history reminds us that even they might very well end up under the guillotine anyway.
Time for a reality check and some modesty. The insane wealth of some at the expense of the vast majority has never proved sustainable. Inequality only breeds violence. We must absolutely reverse this trend. No one needs a trillion dollars to live well.
Liberty Evaluation retweeted
I always hoped we would get robots, flying cars, that drive themselves, computers you can talk to… but one thing I never saw coming was how bitchy people would be about it.
If Toys R Us were still around she would be claiming it is a monopoly destroying small toy stores
I usually don’t agree with a lot of things @SenWarren says, but on this one she is 100% correct. Private equity has destroyed SO many storied brands.
What was the point of all those pages of Why Nations Fail dedicated to the importance of creative destruction?
Nobel Prize-winning MIT economist Daron Acemoglu fears unemployment could triple over the next decade if nothing is done and we stay on our current course. cbsn.ws/4zzQZlF
Liberty Evaluation retweeted
Unions actively undermine economic efficiency by opposing automation:
What’s the right number of grocery stores to have in a competitive market?























