KO retweeted
Here is how 16-year-old Palestinian American Mohammed Ibrahim described watching Walid Ahmad die in front of him:
Israel to release body of Palestinian teen who died malnourished in prison haaretz.com/west-bank/2026-1…
KO retweeted
“For most Pakistani households, the price of a bus ride is a more immediate concern than the price of a new car.” The only sensible analysis of the auto policy I’ve read so far.
There has been a lot of chatter around auto policy, where we all forget that the policy essentially affects the top 2% households - and doesnt do much for anyone else. Moving from ICE to EV is great, but doesn't do much for 98% of households.
1/
dawn.com/news/2042743/rethin…
KO retweeted
Perhaps the most heartless BBC interruption in this compilation is this one:
Bushra Khalidi, Oxfam Policy Lead for Palestine, explains how his family in Gaza have never been allowed to leave Gaza, and how Israel is besieging the Strip and causing mass displacement.
The BBC: "I'm sorry this is obviously very personal, difficult situation for you and your family, and as you would understand as well, Israel would say well, they can't live next door to Hamas."
There is nothing journalistic about this. There is no world where that is a rational, humane response.
The presenters and journalists at the BBC are reading off a strict script where they have to staunchly defend the apartheid entity at all costs.
They have weaponised the term "impartiality", which is what they cite when they launder propaganda. But as we've proven, this "impartiality" has only worked one way.
They interject much less when they platform genocide deniers, and have never volunteered the other things that "Israel says", such as the genocidal statements from Netanyahu, Gallant, Katz, Smotrich and Herzog.
It’s hard to grasp the BBC’s systematic attempt to launder Israeli propaganda until you see the sheer scale of it. Here's a compilation of them doing it at 2x speed.
The latest was on Newsnight on 4 November. When Bernie Sanders called Israel’s government extremist, Victoria Derbyshire answered for it: “And the Israeli government would deny that they are extremists.”
As this video shows, BBC presenters repeatedly do this as guests describe Israel’s crimes: “Israel would say.” “Israel would deny.” “They would reject that.”
We counted 70 of these denials and justifications in 52 aired interviews. The BBC calls this impartiality. But in not one of those 52 did a presenter raise any of these words from Israel’s own leaders:
- “We are fighting human animals.” Yoav Gallant, 9 October 2023
- “It is an entire nation out there that is responsible.” Isaac Herzog, 12 October 2023
- “They will not receive a drop of water or a single battery until they leave the world.” Israel Katz, 13 October 2023
- “Remember what Amalek did to you.” Benjamin Netanyahu, 3 November 2023
- Starving two million people in Gaza until the hostages came back might be “justified and moral”. Bezalel Smotrich, 5 August 2024
On 10 October 2023, Tahani Mustafa told the BBC that Israeli forces were not distinguishing civilians from fighters. The presenter replied: “They would reject that.” Mustafa then had to bring up Gallant’s “human animals” herself. The BBC supplied the denial. The guest had to supply Israel’s own words.
That is cherry-picking. The Royal Charter requires the BBC to be impartial, and the public pays for it through the licence fee. In these interviews, it handed its audience Israel’s denials and left out its leaders’ own words, during a genocide streamed live to the world.
We have archived the BBC’s coverage for three years, and we are now counting all of it: 50,000 video clips and many more written excerpts.
We are calling this first part: "BBC: The Would Say Files".
Handing Israel its denials is only one of the ways the BBC launders Israeli propaganda, so we will count every other technique too. Over the next few weeks, we will announce each milestone as we complete the report.
These are the first results, with every clip, quote and source: newscord.org/editorials/bbc-…
I think this is what @bundeskanzler Metz was talking about when he said Germany needs to kick out Muslims who are not actively helping Germans feel better about helping Israel do Nazi things
Israel to release body of Palestinian teen who died malnourished in prison haaretz.com/west-bank/2026-1…
KO retweeted
This is the memoir of Moshe Dayan. Just as @susanabulhawa described it. archive.org/details/mosheday…
"We let you into our homes when your own countries tried to murder you & everyone else turned you away. We fed you and we clothed you. We gave you shelter and we shared from the bounty of our land with you. And when the time was ripe, you kicked us out of our homes and homeland. Then you killed and robbed and burned and looted our lives." -@susanabulhawa source: youtube.com/watch?v=c2Y-aycE…
Francesca Albanese: “Israel has always killed children... torture, even rape... raped by dogs trained in European countries. European people are profiting from selling dogs that will rape people.”
Irish Sen. Chris Andrews: “Thank you for your ongoing advocacy. It's inspiring.”
KO retweeted
It will never not boggle my mind that this is a real video of Jeffries using George Wallace’s “segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever” quote positively and in relation to his support for Israel
KO retweeted
So the new Israeli narrative is that Israel was just minding its own business and the US told them "We're gonna bomb Iran, don't try to stop us" and Israel was like "WTF that's crazy! I guess we'll support you because we're friends but damn dude that sounds pretty reckless."
Israel's Ambassador to the United Nations Danny Danon on JD Vance:
I think it’s unfortunate that many made the link between rising prices, mainly oil prices, and the situation here in Israel.
The decision to attack Iran was the decision of the United States. It wasn’t our decision. We supported the U.S. effort, and we think it was the right decision.
It’s very easy to always blame Israel for everything, but that is not the case.
KO retweeted
Columbia University, which is in this district, had her arrested for her activism against the genocide as a student. Now the district sent her to congress with overwhelming support.
KO retweeted
Apartheid Israel is the only country in the world where they make feel-good promotional videos about doing Lebensraum, the Nazi practice of creating more living space for Germans [in this case, Jews] by ethnically cleansing everyone else [in this case, Palestinians].
What is happening in Jericho, my hometown, makes me physically sick.
I am outraged. In #Jericho, my hometown, Israeli settlers are celebrating their takeover of eight homes as a historic “return.
“After thousands of years, the people of Israel have returned to settle the city of Jericho.” That is how Hebrew reports celebrated the move on 4 November. Israel Ganz, head of the Binyamin Regional Council, said, “We are returning home.” Daniella Weiss, who chairs the Nachala settlement movement, presented it as part of a wider effort to renew Jewish settlement across the region.
Here is what that “return” looked like for Palestinians in al-Duyuk al-Tahta, west of Jericho. On 4 November, settlers moved into eight homes in an operation organized by Nachala and backed by the Binyamin Regional Council. The organizers claimed they had purchased the properties. Palestinian residents nearby said they were afraid to go back to their own homes. Today settlers are backed by Israeli forces who attacked residents and International activists, beating them and spraying them with pepper spray. Many were injured.
I am a daughter of Jericho, a city with more than 10,000 years of history. I refuse to watch that history be invoked to justify taking over Palestinian homes today. How can anyone celebrate a “return” while the people who live there are afraid to return to their own homes?
My family home is less than 2 Kilometers away !!!
Stop Israeli #impunity
Stop #settlercolonisation
#Jericho #palestine
KO retweeted
Losing gambler energy, can't walk away from the table. Boss is prepping the next war phase while America teeters on an Israel-First cliff. Skip the TED talk. Why not say this to your boss?
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up.
So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us."
Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026.
There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true.
But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone.
Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were:
1) End the war
2) Focus on cost of living/inflation
3) Put America First
4) Change our relationship to Israel
Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.)
In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you.
The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night.
If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest.
But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there.
I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
KO retweeted
"Biden’s Choice
Ben Rhodes
As Israel’s assault on Gaza grew worse and worse, Joe Biden and his advisers acted as though they had no option but to offer their unconditional support. Why couldn’t they see the destruction they were enabling?"
nybooks.com/articles/2026/11…
Guys it's just a midterm loss why are republican sons and daughters knifing their fathers in the back.
Its been well known for decades that the American VP was a useless ceremonial job but this is a new low, the sitting VP is angling for a podcast/influencer role by posting against his dear leader on X.
If Vance had balls, he would have resigned instead of this rubbish.
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up.
So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us."
Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026.
There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true.
But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone.
Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were:
1) End the war
2) Focus on cost of living/inflation
3) Put America First
4) Change our relationship to Israel
Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.)
In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you.
The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night.
If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest.
But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there.
I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
Even American's who sort of get it don't quite fully get how ridiculous this whole Israel made us do it schtick is.
xitter.cf/paulg/status/211804131…
Replying to @JDVance
1) End the war
2) Focus on cost of living/inflation
3) Put America First
4) Change our relationship to Israel
These are all the same thing. The cost of living is high because Israel convinced Trump to start a war with Iran, instead of putting America first.
KO retweeted
Shoalhaven Council’s abrupt cancellation of the Wall of Tears exhibition is another shocking example of anti-Palestinian racism. Taking the time to remember and honour the children behind the horrifying statistics is truly the bare minimum as Israel’s genocide in Gaza continues.
KO retweeted
I was convinced this is AI, then remembered it is an election contest in the US, where candidates are judged on their fealty to a foreign state before their views about their own country.
But still, this is so over the top can it possibly be genuine?
KO retweeted
Publication of this 25 March 2003 photo, or one very like it, finally stopped me from reading any Australian newspapers.
This caption reads:
"A British Royal Marine from Taunton, England, gives out sweets to Iraqi children" in Umm Qasr, southern Iraq.
Photographer: Jon Mills, Associated Press.




































