Eternl

The same people using "capitalism" and "minimum wage" arguments as justification for their rationale to decrease minPoolFee also want the "government" to cap the size of success (k = 1000). You don't get to have it both ways. All of this, ostensibly, to help some diaphanous "small pool" class that doesn't exist. There is only below K and above K. All of this led by the "Parameter Committee" to tweak and adjust the one stable and arguably "working" piece of Cardano which is the decentralized, censorship resistant validator set. When will the "Parameter Committee" suggest changes to the minUTxO, txFees, Treasury Tax, or block and tx sizes to actually make Cardano more competitive as a chain that can serve real world commercial use cases? When will they act at a pace more frequent than one change every 12-18 months? Why do we need them? What would you say they actually do here? Solutions: 1. Decrease minUTxO as aggressively as possible in a single step 2. Decrease tx fees with a standing mandate to keep "average" tx fees at or under $0.01/tx 3. Decrease the Treasury Tax rate to begin the process of removing reliance on it by slowing it's fill rate 4. Increase block sizes and Smart Contract budgets to give a nominal improvement to potential TPS while we await Leios 5. Stop f*cking with the things that aren't broken