Get ideology out of science, nature lover, I can change my mind if I see new evidence, wants peace on Earth - Gen X
Australia
Joined January 2024
- Tweets24.1K
- Following3.7K
- Followers909
- Likes144K
DocStrange retweeted
Holly Bruce came armed with accusations. Susan Smith came armed with lived experience.
Bruce suggested that defending women's single-sex spaces puts masculine lesbians, women with alopecia and cancer patients at risk of being challenged over whether they look female enough.
What she apparently hadn't reckoned with was that Susan Smith, of For Women Scotland, is herself a cancer survivor who lost her hair during treatment.
Susan wasn't having it.
There's something deeply patronising about suggesting that a woman somehow becomes less recognisably female because she's bald, wears men's clothing or doesn't conform to feminine stereotypes.
And Susan exposed the contradiction. Women have fought for generations against being defined by how they look. Now they're being told that recognising biological sex somehow threatens those very women.
One woman was arguing about appearances. The other was defending the principle that women are women, regardless of appearance.
The point Susan makes is devastatingly simple: a woman doesn't cease to be a woman because she's bald, masculine or doesn't conform to someone's idea of femininity.
Protecting women's spaces doesn't require policing how women look. It requires recognising that sex matters.
Watch Susan put the record straight.
@ForWomenScot
DocStrange retweeted
This is absolutely brilliant, by legendary Australian investor John Hempton, who explains the core financial paradox at the heart of the AI story (and which also, to some extent, may explain the Jensen Huang story).
The numbers say that about $7 trillion in AI compute is set to be built by 2030. For the industry to earn that back, given those chips have a roughly 5-year lifespan and cost a lot to run, they need to generate about $2 trillion of AI revenue a year.
Hempton says the only way you can get to these sorts of numbers is by selling AI as a productivity tool to businesses, meaning replacing workers.
And since, for reasons he explains in the video, no company fires people to save just 10% in costs, the savings have to be about double what businesses pay for the AI: roughly $4 trillion in savings on wages a year.
What does firing $4 trillion worth of workers mean concretely? Hempton calculated this equates to roughly 10% of the OECD’s total wage bill of about $40 trillion: one in every ten dollars paid to workers across the OECD’s 38 member countries.
Which, naturally, when you suddenly take that much income out of people’s pockets, would trigger a massive global recession.
And here's the paradox: in a massive global recession, there's no way businesses will pay $2 trillion a year for AI, so the return disappears anyway.
In other words, AI's only possible path to success given the numbers requires destroying the very economy that is supposed to pay for it.
HOWEVER - and here's where the Nvidia/Jensen Huang story might come into play (and, to be clear, this is now me speaking and not Hempton given this interview is prior to the whole Nvidia saga) - this all rests on a core assumption: that compute stays super expensive. Which in practice means Nvidia keeping its pricing power, with a 75% gross margin on its chips.
Break Nvidia's pricing power, and the $7 trillion bill, the $2 trillion in revenue and the 10% of jobs all shrink with it.
This would also put the whole China story in a different light. Maybe it's not so much a "we don't want the Chinese to be competitive with similar chips to us" story as it is a "we don't want Chinese demand to drive up chip prices" one. Or probably both.
And, as such, you could actually think about the US export controls not as a national security measure but as a good old subsidy for US AI players (together with a handicap for their Chinese competitors), a way to limit the price of chips.
This holds even with China itself blocking Nvidia imports, since Chinese firms simply rent the chips abroad instead, in places like Southeast Asia, which is precisely what this whole Alice Huang/Megaspeed story is about.
The main obstacle for all this was, of course... Jensen. Obviously, the guy wanted the exact opposite: as many buyers as possible, Chinese players included, to keep chip prices and Nvidia’s margins sky-high. He was also the one man with the clout to make that happen.
All hard to prove, of course, but I can imagine that quite a few corks popped this week in Anthropic's offices: nothing like the news that the man keeping your biggest cost sky-high is out when you're a week away from a $1.2 trillion IPO.
DocStrange retweeted
Why do you think they hate this man so deeply?
He threw Soros out of Russia. He was called "a threat to the world order" by Jacob Rothschild in 2015, He banned Genetically Modified plants and animals, He banned LGBTQ ideology from Schools
He actually puts "Russia First"
DocStrange retweeted
🚨 AUSTRALIAN HIGHER EDUCATION AND UNIVERSITIES: THE GENDER GAP KEEPS GROWING 🚨
For every 100 Australian men completing a university or other higher education qualification, there are now 166 women. Five female graduates for every three male graduates. This is the largest disparity on record...
On 2 November 2026, the federal Department of Education released updated national statistics on Award Course Completions, including figures for 2025.
The results are deeply concerning:
📊 1989: 1.26 female graduates for every male graduate.
📊 2004: 1.39 female graduates for every male graduate.
📊 2015: 1.47 female graduates for every male graduate.
📊 2020: 1.52 female graduates for every male graduate.
📊 2025: 1.66 female graduates for every male graduate.
📊 Female share: Approximately 62.5% of domestic higher education course completions, compared with just 37.5% for males.
📊 Long-term trend: The imbalance has been widening for decades, despite women achieving parity in university four decades ago.
We rightly celebrated the expansion of educational opportunities for women. But why is the continuing deterioration in men's relative educational outcomes met with such indifference?
Where is the national strategy to reverse this trend? Where are the ambitious targets, dedicated funding, institutional accountability and evidence-based interventions?
Our universities are taxpayer-funded institutions. They have an obligation to serve both sexes, including the growing numbers of boys and young men being left behind educationally...
Five days before International Men's Day, when are we going to take this enormous gender disparity seriously?
Genuine Gender Equality cannot mean celebrating female advancement while ignoring male disadvantage...
We need genuine equality of opportunity, compassion for both sexes, and practical action to improve outcomes for boys and men.
The Future Is Everyone.
#InternationalMensDay #GenderEqualityForMen #MensEqualityMonth #HigherEducation #BoysEducation #Australia
DocStrange retweeted
Hey @grok, concise, no spin.
In 1865, Abraham Lincoln had CRUSHED the Confederacy and helped destroy slavery. The defeated government had a powerful secretary of state who controlled SECRET OPERATIONS and intelligence agents abroad.
John Wilkes Booth, the actor who would ASSASSINATE LINCOLN, had traveled to Canada, where Confederate spies operated.
One of Booth’s accomplices later claimed that the SAME secretary of state personally gave him $200 IN GOLD and SECRET ORDERS.
On April 1, that SAME official obtained another $1,500 IN GOLD from a secret government account.
Just FIVE DAYS after the Confederate army surrendered, Booth SHOT LINCOLN IN THE HEAD.
Investigators discovered that LINCOLN’S ASSASSIN possessed a SECRET MILITARY SPY CODE used by Confederate intelligence agents to encrypt communications. The SAME CIPHER SYSTEM was found in that official’s abandoned office.
The secretary of state then FLED AMERICA IN DISGUISE.
@grok, who was this Confederate secretary of state, and what was his religious background?
@grok, full name and religion ethnicity only.
DocStrange retweeted
JOINT COMMITTEE ON IMPROVING MEN'S HEALTH AND WELLBEING
Further information about the Committee can be found on the Committee's webpage
parliament.sa.gov.au/en/News…
DocStrange retweeted
Rome did not play games with child rapists.
Rome was an empire of order.
And Rome understood one thing the modern West has forgotten: a man who touches a child has declared war on the entire family, and the family must answer with death.
In old Rome, a child was not just a child. A child was a paterfamilias in training. A child was the future of the bloodline. A child was the honour of the house. To violate a child was to violate the honour of Rome itself.
The Romans had a word for it: stuprum. It meant sexual disgrace. It meant defilement. It was not a private sin; it was a public crime against the state.
If a man raped a child, he was not sent to therapy. He was not given a second chance. He was not protected by human rights lawyers.
He was dragged before the court. He was tried under the Lex Julia de vi publica, the law against public violence. If found guilty, he was executed: sometimes by beheading, sometimes by being thrown from the Tarpeian Rock, sometimes by being beaten to death in public, so that every man in Rome would see what happens to a predator.
Rome did not wonder what his childhood was like. Rome did not consider whether he was mentally ill. Rome did not debate whether he could be rehabilitated.
Rome asked one question: did he do it? If yes, he died.
That is why Roman mothers could send their children to the market without fear. That is why Roman fathers could sleep at night. The predator knew: if I touch a child in Rome, Rome will kill me.
There were no NGOs in Rome to defend the rapist. There were no journalists to call the punishment Islamophobic, racist, or inhumane. There were no activists holding signs saying, "His life matters too."
In Rome, the child's life mattered. The predator's life did not.
The father of the victim had the vitae necisque potestas, the power of life and death over his household. If a man defiled his child, the father could kill him on the spot, and Roman law would call it justice, not murder.
Today in London, a man rapes a child and gets eight years, or one year of unpaid labour with no jail time. Today in Paris, a man rapes a child and gets sympathy. Today in America, a man rapes a child and the media worries about his pronouns.
Rome would have looked at the modern West and called it a civilisation in collapse. A civilisation that cannot protect its children has already lost its right to exist.
Rome fell when it stopped being Rome: when it became soft, when it became tolerant, when it began to protect criminals instead of children.
The West is now repeating the fall of Rome.
t.me/fmazhindu
DocStrange retweeted
Remember world leaders met with this imbecilic truant & destroyed their energy policies to placate global warming hysterics.
DocStrange retweeted
Rebecca was sold into sexual slavery before she could walk. Her father - a Lockheed Martin contractor with CIA connections - gave her to a man she calls "Mr. E" as a newborn baby. Mr. E ran a child pornography ring, and Rebecca became his product. From birth to age seven, she was drugged with ketamine, flown across the country, and passed between groups of men who filmed themselves doing things to her that would make a courtroom go silent.
Her mother wasn't a victim in this. Her mother was part of it. She beat Rebecca unconscious and sexually abused her herself. The woman who gave birth to her helped deliver her into hell.
In the interview, Rebecca says it out loud, and the room stops breathing. They violated her with objects. They shoved a loaded gun in her mouth. They forced a loaded gun inside her body. She was three. They filmed everything.
But that's not the detail that breaks her. She watched children die. During these filmed sessions, other kids were murdered in front of her. Their deaths were turned into content - sexualized, recorded, distributed. And after, the men would look down at her and say: if you ever tell anyone what happened here, you're next.
They choked her until she passed out. They suffocated her until her body stopped fighting. They dragged her to the edge of death again and again because watching a child almost die was entertainment to them. She says she learned what dying felt like before she learned how to read.
At seven, they threw her away. She wasn't rescued. No one came for her. She simply got too old for their taste. Seven years old and already used up.
She's 53 now. Fifty years later, and not one person from that network has been investigated. She looks into the camera and asks the only question that matters - how did every single one of them walk free?
This woman spent half a century carrying the memory of children being killed in front of her. She was drugged, filmed, violated with weapons, and discarded before she understood what a childhood was supposed to look like. And the people who did it? They're still out there. Living normal lives. Untouched.
DocStrange retweeted
This is a monumental scandal. @AlboMP has 59 political advisers in his own office. Not one of their salaries or job descriptions are published. We are paying them $20.5 million dollars.
Thanks to glasshouse.au for the information.
DocStrange retweeted
THINK ABOUT IT.
- Bill Gates had lots of illicit girlfriends—no problem.
- Elon Musk has multiple children with multiple women—no problem.
- Dario Amodei dated a Chinese woman, Jade Wang, before marrying Cami Clark, who pitched a pornography business to none other than Jeffrey Epstein—no problem.
- But Jensen Huang commits old-fashioned infidelity—and this is such a big problem that he has to resign?
Doesn’t make sense.
Here’s the real story.
.
CHAPTER ONE: BIDEN’S CHIP WAR
Jensen Huang of Nvidia was puzzled. It was 2022, and his video-graphics processors had become globally popular as the heart of high-end computing across the planet.
But that autumn, Biden violated the World Trade Organization’s most fundamental principles. He ordered the world’s makers of advanced semiconductor chips and chipmaking equipment (in the Netherlands, Taiwan and Japan) to stop sales to China.
Biden’s administration implied that the chips were for China’s military gear, but this was a lie. The US’s own security establishment admitted that 99.9 per cent were used for civilian purposes, like medical technology and AI computing.
Huang was dismayed. He could no longer sell Nvidia’s A100 and H100 to China.
.
CHAPTER TWO: SOLVING A PROBLEM
Jensen Huang was a problem-solver. In February of 2024, Nvidia launched the H20, a made-for-China AI chip less powerful than its US-only top model.
That way he could keep the US government happy but also have something to sell to the Chinese.
Not everyone in the US was happy about this, and export rules fluctuated.
.
CHAPTER THREE: THE DEEPSEEK MOMENT
In January 2025, a nerdy young man from the Chinese finance industry announced that his firm Deepseek had quickly and cheaply created a high-efficiency open-weight AI.
The implication was huge: the Chinese were finding ways to develop top level AI functionality without massive clusters of top-tier Nvidia GPUs.
Jensen Huang knew he had to respond urgently to keep his place in the China market. He flew to meet trade officials in Beijing in the middle of April and vowed to make "every effort" to serve the Chinese.
The US anti-China hawks had been quietly mobilizing—and made an announcement. In April of 2025, the US banned all export of Jensen Huang’s H20s to China.
Unbelievable! The Nvidia CEO was furious. "Anybody who thought that one chess move to ban China from H20s would cut off their AI ability is deeply uninformed," Huang told an interviewer at a trade meeting in Taipei.
.
CHAPTER FOUR: HUANG’S SPECIAL SKILL
Then came some rare good news. The Nvidia CEO started lobbying Trump behind the scenes. Huang was a master negotiator – and his efforts proved successful.
In the middle of July, 2025, Huang was back in China—his third trip in 12 months.
Huang appeared without his signature black leather jacket. Instead, he wore a traditional Chinese tang suit, and made some of his speech in Mandarin.
Washington had cleared the way for Nvidia to export the H20 to China, he said. We’re back!
Trump had demanded a cash cut of H20 sales in return for approving the exports—US government policy appeared to be literally for sale.
.
CHAPTER FIVE: SPOOKS WERE NOT HAPPY
Huang was moving chips to China again, and the anti-China hawks in the US government were unhappy—and so were the spooks.
There’s a widespread tendency to visualize the US intelligence community as right-leaning hard men, Trumpites in black suits.
This was the opposite of the truth. The CIA leadership greatly preferred the simple, blanket negativity towards “the enemy” characteristic of the Democratic Party. With Russians, Chinese, and North Koreans portrayed as cartoon villains, black ops were justifiable.
But for all his bluster, Trump had a propensity towards treating the leaders of Russia, China and even North Korea, as actual humans who could be negotiated with.
This transactional approach was enormously problematic for the CIA, which needed cartoon villains to justify their annual budget of more than US$15 billion.
And Trump’s habit of parachuting unsuitable new leaders in to command the intelligence community—such as the widely disliked Mike Pompeo—crystalized the negativity, as CIA chroniclers have written.
.
CHAPTER SIX: A TWIST IN THE TALE
Jensen Huang’s celebrations were short-lived. In an unexpected twist, China in September 2025 said it did not want Nvidia chips and would no longer buy them.
- US$15 billion in sales projections vanished.
- Nvidia had to write off a reported $5.5 billion in inventory losses.
- The company had now completely lost access to China's AI market, estimated at US$50 billion.
- And hard evidence was emerging that Chinese companies were building alternatives even for CUDA (a unique element in Nvidia chips).
Huang wanted more positivity from the US. Nvidia was a US firm, and it went from having a 95% market share in China to 0%. “I can’t imagine any policymaker thinking that that’s a good idea,” he told reporters.
.
CHAPTER SEVEN: AGAIN, HE SOLVES THE PROBLEM
But Huang’s extraordinary skill in dealing with Trump paid off again, and by mid-2026, the Nvidia business found a complex equilibrium had emerged in its China business.
Huang had (in December 2025) persuaded the US President to allow Nvidia to sell even the high-powered H200 chip to China, as long as the US government got 25% of the take. So a range of Nvidia chips could again be sold in China.
- Other Nvidia chips were arriving in China via the black market.
- There were suspicions that companies in Singapore and Malaysia, such as Megaspeed, were flouting export restrictions, also delivering chips.
- Some Nvidia chips were stuck in Hong Kong, trapped by the confusing, ever-changing rules, but were expected to be released eventually.
- On the downside (from Huang’s point of view), new China-origin chips, notably Huawei’s Ascend 950, were catching up with advanced capabilities that mimicked those of Nvidia.
In short, China was back in the game.
.
CHAPTER EIGHT: TAKING HIM DOWN
Something had to be done. China had to be dealt with. But first, Huang had to be taken down.
The US anti-China hawks saw Huang’s success in making deals with Trump as a key part of the problem. It was an element which had to be surgically removed.
The CIA and their partners in the western mainstream media sprang into action.
In October 2026, the US intelligence community told New York Times reporters that there were suspicions that Huang’s mistress, Alice Huang Le, was a Chinese spy.
It provided no evidence.
The allegation was plainly ridiculous—the flow of legitimate and illegitimate chips across the border was no secret, and the idea that discussions about the detailed minutiae of nano-level semiconductor engineering could be exchanged during pillow talk was ridiculous, even comedic.
But when the US intelligence community and the mainstream media join forces, they’re virtually invincible.
At this moment in the process, the complicit media are playing its role. A typical headline was that in the Economist yesterday:
“Jensen Huang must resign.”
.
EPILOGUE
Jensen Huang resigned.
Trump has been weakened.
The world’s public has been fooled with the “honeypot” story.
China’s Huawei is pressing ahead—with new, powerful versions of its Ascend chips slated to come out in 2027 and 2028.
.
.
DocStrange retweeted
😳😳
I am afraid this man is absolutely right and there is a huge problem coming our way.
😱
DocStrange retweeted
If you come from the subcontinent or Africa, and gain Australian citizenship, you are NOT Australian.
You are a citizen.
Stop culturally appropriating something you are not. You didn’t create this culture or nation and do not share heritage or language.
DocStrange retweeted
If you’re dealing with people who will accept male sex offenders in women’s prisons & men “breastfeeding” babies you’re dealing with people in a cult. No rational person would accept it.
DocStrange retweeted
We are in the midst of a five-alarm fire on free speech and privacy internationally.
Politicians across the West are demanding new powers for their spy agencies to do what East Germany's secret police, the Stasi, did.
Americans, Europeans, and anyone else online will have their privacy invaded, and personal information, including information about their health and sexual orientation, potentially shared with foreign spy agencies, if the Australian Senate passes the @AlboMP government's totalitarian bill.
New investigative reporting by @MikeNayna, @NAffects, and @itshermargaret reveals that the Albanese government buried in its censorship legislation a radical change to the nation's Privacy Act, one that would open the door to unprecedented secret spying globally.
It's coming at a time when governments in Europe, the UK, and Brazil are all demanding ever-more censorship of their enemies.
Behind the war on free speech is a war on ordinary people seeking to defend core civilizational pillars, from borders to industry to the rights of women.
The iconic 2006 film "The Lives of Others," about the Stasi, is about what happens when politicians decide their citizens are the enemy. That's what's happening today.
It's fitting that the main character on that film poster should be Australia's Prime Minister @AlboMP, whose legislation would weaponize the nation's censorship agency, the "eSafety Commissioner," to spy on citizens and report them to their governments for thought-crime violations.
Every free person in the West should be alarmed by this development and see @AlboMP and his apparatchiks for what they are: a clear and present danger to our freedoms and civilization itself.
It's up to free people to spread the word about this five-alarm fire and resist with everything we've got.
🤖 Made with AI
DocStrange retweeted
🚨 GLOBALISM JUST DIED IN DAVOS
Howard Lutnick just walked into the lion’s den — and told the World Economic Forum exactly what they didn’t want to hear.
“Globalism has failed.”
Not whispered.
Not softened.
Declared — on their own stage.
He dismantled the entire WEF doctrine in minutes:
• Offshoring hollowed out the West
• Cheap labor destroyed innovation
• Net Zero made Europe dependent on China
• Sovereignty begins with borders
• Nations must control their industry, energy, and medicine
Then came the line that shook the room:
“Why would Europe agree to Net Zero when they don’t even make a battery?”
That’s the truth globalists can’t answer.
Green agendas without industry.
Climate pledges without sovereignty.
Moral posturing while outsourcing power to Beijing.
America First isn’t isolation.
It’s independence.
And Lutnick made it crystal clear:
The old model is finished.
The globalist experiment has failed.
And the future belongs to nations that put their people first.
Davos just heard the obituary — live.
DocStrange retweeted
Harvard Law School clinical instructor and trans activist Alejandra Caraballo has flown into a rage at the news that Paul Garcia-Ryan, a detransitioner who runs a collective of therapists who prioritize counseling over medical transition for patients with gender dysphoria, is guest editing an issue of Frontiers In Psychiatry on youth with GD.
As she is wont to do, Caraballo denounces Garcia-Ryan, whose story of having undergone estrogen treatment and a vaginoplasty in his 20s only to regret it was featured in a chilling Pamela Paul editorial in the Times, as a conversion therapist.
Therapy First, the organization that Garcia-Ryan runs, is adamant that it does not practice conversion therapy, which is the practice of attempting, often through coercion, to alter a patient’s sexual orientation or gender identity. Rather, the collective says it seeks to explore a patient’s gender-related distress as it would any major life problem.
“This is incredibly disgusting to see a prestigious journal mainstreaming a conversion therapist and his organization like this,” Caraballo seethes. She demands to know how someone with an MSW could be tasked with guest editing a psychiatry journal.
