Anne Wojcicki (@annewoj23) header
Anne Wojcicki (@annewoj23) profile picture

CEO and Founder, 23andMe Research Institute

Palo Alto, CA
Joined January 2012
Photo by Anne Wojcicki (@annewoj23)Photo by Anne Wojcicki (@annewoj23)Photo by Anne Wojcicki (@annewoj23)Photo by Anne Wojcicki (@annewoj23)Photo by Anne Wojcicki (@annewoj23)Photo by Anne Wojcicki (@annewoj23)Photo by Anne Wojcicki (@annewoj23)Photo by Anne Wojcicki (@annewoj23)Photo by Anne Wojcicki (@annewoj23)Photo by Anne Wojcicki (@annewoj23)
Anne Wojcicki retweeted
We are at the beginning of a new and exciting era to be able to program our immune system in the body (in vivo). This new review @SciImmunology nails it science.org/doi/10.1126/scii…
28
127
8
446
35,127
Anne Wojcicki retweeted
The governor-elect of Texas, Gina Hinojosa, has explicitly said that all currently permitted datacenters in Texas will be allowed to finish construction. This essentially covers all of the 2027 and likely well into 2028. She is going to pass laws that ensure that all *newly* permitted datacenters going forward for delivery in 2028/2029 will pay taxes, commit to no increase in power prices for consumers, don’t impact water availability for people, be constructed with union labor and give “Texans a seat at the table.” Sounds reasonable. She doesn’t want to lose a lot of good blue collar jobs and property taxes for small towns in rural Texas. Datacenter commentary starts at 6:30 in this interview. Also attaching her official campaign position from her website in the next post. Sidenote: After watching a bunch of her speeches and interviews, I do think she is a political talent and probably has a future in national politics. youtu.be/D-T6H3b8ZeE?is=mEWu…
1,639
2,208
1,045
17,459
18,370,322
Specially thanks to: ❤️❤️ Matthew Patrick @matpatgt Stephanie Patrick @cordypatrick Mark Vins @BraveWilderness Marina Mogilko @SiliconValleyGirl Jake Roper @Vsauce3 Cassey Ho @blogilates Cleo Abram @CleoAbram Lilly Singh @LillySingh sWooZie @swoozie Vanessa & Veronica Merrell @merrelltwins Hank Green @hankschannel Mark Rober @MarkRober Rhett & Link @GoodMythicalMorning Jimmy Donaldson @MrBeast Dr. Mike @DoctorMike Dr. Eric Singhi @lungoncdoc Stephanie Chuang @ThePatientStory Danielle Hicks @GO2forLungCancer Dr. Sydney Barned @DrYolaOLO Yvonne Diaz @yvonne_diaz_lc Dr. Charles Swanton
1
1,542
My dad loved neutrinos and spent his life researching them. I remember my friends asking him why he liked neutrinos and he gave a similar answer to Dr Halzin: “It doesn’t affect us at all. We are walking in a sea of neutrinos made by the sun. But you are not aware of it — they don’t interact with your body.” They are not in your body or environment but are important for the universe. I appreciate the people who pursue basic science for the sake of knowledge and the hope of one day understanding the universe🙏 nytimes.com/2026/10/26/style…
3
2
48
6,757
Anne Wojcicki retweeted
That’s a wrap for #ASHG26. Thank you to the event organizers for hosting a great conference. At ASHG, the 23andMe Research Institute introduced new capabilities designed to give researchers more flexibility, depth and clinical context by connecting genetics with de-identified real-world health data. We discussed our commitment to expanding access to genetic and phenotypic data, so more scientists can bring their own questions to our cohort of more than 11 million consented participants. All of this rests on our longstanding commitment to participant consent, privacy and trust, and to rigorous research practices. The questions facing human genetics are too big for any one team to answer alone. That’s why we’re grateful to connect with new partners who share our view of making a real impact through the scale and depth of our genetic and phenotypic data.
2
4
15
3,967
Did your @23andMe years ago? Your DNA hasn’t changed, but what we can learn from it has. Polygenic risk scores now combine hundreds or thousands of genetic variants to estimate risk for conditions like heart disease, which can help people plan screening and prevention with their doctor. Log back in and see what’s new. 23andme.org
5
4
1
42
10,231
Anne Wojcicki retweeted
Think men can't get breast cancer or that Dad's side of the family doesn't count? Think again. It's Men's Breast Cancer Awareness Week, and genetic counselor Stacey is busting 3 common myths surrounding men and BRCA genes in this video. Watch to learn why both sides of your family tree matter. Learn more: 23andme.org/blog/articles/un… #MensBreastCancerAwarenessWeek #Genetics #FamilyHealth #BRCA #BreastCancerAwareness #23andMe
2
4
7
3,167
Anne Wojcicki retweeted
The 23andMe Research Institute is at #ASHG26 in Montreal this week. Our Vice President of Research, Adam Auton, is speaking today on “Genetic Discovery at Population Scale: What Becomes Possible with 11 Million Research Participants.” And our Chief Medical Officer, Dr. Noura Abul-Husn, is presenting on Friday on how we’re powering population-scale health outcomes. Check out our talks and stop by our booth. We look forward to connecting with you: 23andme.org/blog/articles/23… #ASHG2026 #Genomics #PreventiveHealth #Biotech #GeneticsResearch
1
4
9
3,571
My favorite meeting of the year is the annual genetics meeting, ASHG. Being surround by scientists and learning is such a privilege - with @23andMe we bring these insights to you so you are part of the incredible process of decoding the code of life. This is the most fascinating scientific pursuit we could be taking on (IMO)!! So many exciting opportunities as we learn how to predict, prevent and cure disease. Stay tuned!! 🧬🧬
6
2
74
6,352
When I was investing in healthcare in the early 2000s, the US was an incredible force in biotech and China was known for just making raw materials. Wow, the world has flipped. It’s remarkable how China has become a powerhouse in drug discovery and is now leading. The world will shift again with AI, but the country that wins will be the ones that have large data initiatives to fuel discovery and a nimble regulatory oversight to partner and not hinder progress.
In January 2025 my mom’s lung cancer spread to her brain. The drug with the best chance of helping her was approved in China but not here. A doctor told me, almost as an aside, that if she were Chinese she could buy it at a pharmacy. So I flew to Shanghai and came home with 26 boxes in my luggage. That was 19 months ago. My mom is still here, still working, and in her words has had an amazing three years. The drug was approved in China in 2023. The FDA approved it in July 2025. It still is not for sale here. I know of at least 30 Americans who have made the same trip. I have been scared to tell this story because I worried it could cost my mom access to the medicine keeping her alive. But the problem matters more than my silence. These drugs need to be developed and available here, and that means FDA reform. Art Allen at KFF Health News told our story this week. It also ran in The Washington Post. kffhealthnews.org/health-ind…
14
12
2
130
17,196
Anne Wojcicki retweeted
From the Nile to the Yemeni Highlands, centuries of history can show up in your DNA. 🌍 Our 163 newly added Genetic Groups span Egypt, North Africa and the Arabian Peninsula, bringing our total to more than 5,000 regions. Check your 23andMe app to see your updated Ancestry Composition report. Learn more: 23andme.org/blog/articles/23…
2
6
1
15
3,459
This is a remarkable story @RadicalNumerics and a real use case of how AI can be used for new treatments.
Quite a lede "For the first time, scientists say they have used viruses designed by AI to treat a human patient." Front page @nytimes gift link nytimes.com/2026/10/20/scien…
7
28
12,651
Loved talking healthcare with @fuelfive on “Progress” by @fiftyyears. We got into why the system can't fix itself, the loophole (you're in charge of your own health), and what AI can actually do for biology. Watch the full episode here: youtu.be/-a6nViq2rYA
The ideal amount of healthcare is zero. Progress ep09 is live with @annewoj23, co-founder of 23andMe. We explore why "it's much cheaper if people die of a heart attack," running your own health with AI, and winning 23andMe back out of bankruptcy.
1
5
18
11,056
Anne Wojcicki retweeted
“Your genome isn’t a daily dashboard. It tells you which dashboard to build” 👏🏼 More on the EGFR T790M variant that @annewoj23 references below: dana-farber.org/newsroom/new…
Bryan, you’re right that for someone measuring hundreds of biomarkers a month, the genome adds less on the cardiometabolic side. But you’re an outlier. Most people don’t want to test themselves continuously, and most can’t. Even for you, your genome answers questions your biomarkers can’t. Blood work shows where you are now, not what’s coming. If you carried a BRCA2 variant, your prostate cancer risk would be meaningfully higher, often with earlier onset and faster progression. No panel flags that risk, but it changes when you start screening and how often. And most people with harmful variants in genes like BRCA1 and BRCA2 are not aware that they have them. There are also new and impactful discoveries still being made from the genome. We recently published a Science paper with Dana Farber on our discovery of an EGFR variant that increases lung cancer risk by 25x - far more than smoking history does (~3.8x). Lung screening guidelines are based on smoking history, so carriers go unnoticed unless someone reads their genome. The negatives matter just as much. Knowing you don’t carry a high-risk variant is information too. It enables you to know you don’t need increased screening beyond what guidelines recommend. Your APOE result counts even though it didn’t change your protocol, because it ruled something out. The genome also answers questions that go beyond your own health. For anyone planning to have kids, carrier screening shows whether both parents carry a recessive variant for a heritable condition like cystic fibrosis or spinal muscular atrophy. It’s an answer you want before a pregnancy, not after, and learning you’re not a carrier is just as valuable. This isn’t niche. On Friday at the American Society of Human Genetics (ASHG), Dr. Noura Abul-Husn presents data on ~6M people who got 23andMe health reports. More than 1 in 10 (660K+) had a medically actionable result linked to a health risk with established screening or prevention guidelines. These results change how people understand their personal health risks and empower them (and their doctors) to take action to stay healthy. Your genome isn’t a daily dashboard. It tells you which dashboard to build, and where to focus your attention.
4
1
8
4,213
Not quite @emilylmullin. Customers return regularly when we launch new ancestry insights or health reports. DNA relatives also drives huge engagement. When we ask customers to participate in research, I am always amazed and grateful for their willingness to jump in and participate. Over 85% consent to research. 23andMe always had big goals - empower everyone with their genome and create the world’s largest recontactable community for research. When we launched therapeutics in 2015 we were one of the first to be taking a big bet on large genetic datasets and drug discovery - something that now most therapeutic companies are leaning into. As you know since you cover the field, drug discovery takes a long time and is expensive. Profitability was not on the road map as we had over 50 programs in various stages of development. We are now a non-profit and focused on mission and impact. We will continue to help people always get affordable access to their genome. We have had a subscription service since 2019 that gives customers access to the latest reports and premium ancestry features. We continue to focus on impact with our data and how we can help the entire research community move faster and develop better therapeutics. Always happy to chat. It’s time for you to login again to your account!!
It's why 23andMe never turned a profit. Customers rarely returned to their results, and the company never figured out how to use its massive trove of genetic data to develop drugs.
7
2
28
10,374
Good question, Bryan. Since the start, 23andMe’s mission has been to help people understand their genetic information and apply it to their lives. Most doctors don’t have time to keep up with the latest insights and recommendations on what to do with genetic data. We distill that knowledge into health reports people can act on, and we routinely translate new discoveries into personalized insights. When we release a new report, it can reach and impact millions of people. We take that responsibility seriously, making sure what we deliver is accurate, scientifically credible, and clear about who it applies to. There are a lot of genetic studies out there, but not all of them hold up, and not all of them are relevant to every population. I recognize you’re a power user. It might make sense for you to connect with @NouraAbulHusn and look at how we could combine your biomarker and screening data with the genomic knowledge we have in house.
Replying to @annewoj23
Anne given all you’ve learned about the genome, are there tools you suggest I use to try and continually get the most out of the information?
5
3
54
16,090
Bryan, you’re right that for someone measuring hundreds of biomarkers a month, the genome adds less on the cardiometabolic side. But you’re an outlier. Most people don’t want to test themselves continuously, and most can’t. Even for you, your genome answers questions your biomarkers can’t. Blood work shows where you are now, not what’s coming. If you carried a BRCA2 variant, your prostate cancer risk would be meaningfully higher, often with earlier onset and faster progression. No panel flags that risk, but it changes when you start screening and how often. And most people with harmful variants in genes like BRCA1 and BRCA2 are not aware that they have them. There are also new and impactful discoveries still being made from the genome. We recently published a Science paper with Dana Farber on our discovery of an EGFR variant that increases lung cancer risk by 25x - far more than smoking history does (~3.8x). Lung screening guidelines are based on smoking history, so carriers go unnoticed unless someone reads their genome. The negatives matter just as much. Knowing you don’t carry a high-risk variant is information too. It enables you to know you don’t need increased screening beyond what guidelines recommend. Your APOE result counts even though it didn’t change your protocol, because it ruled something out. The genome also answers questions that go beyond your own health. For anyone planning to have kids, carrier screening shows whether both parents carry a recessive variant for a heritable condition like cystic fibrosis or spinal muscular atrophy. It’s an answer you want before a pregnancy, not after, and learning you’re not a carrier is just as valuable. This isn’t niche. On Friday at the American Society of Human Genetics (ASHG), Dr. Noura Abul-Husn presents data on ~6M people who got 23andMe health reports. More than 1 in 10 (660K+) had a medically actionable result linked to a health risk with established screening or prevention guidelines. These results change how people understand their personal health risks and empower them (and their doctors) to take action to stay healthy. Your genome isn’t a daily dashboard. It tells you which dashboard to build, and where to focus your attention.
I can't find a way to use my genome. I’m the most intense longevity athlete in the world and haven’t used my genome for a single thing. Fully sequenced in 2012. Again this year, paying $7,902 for matched 30x long read + 100x short read. Still, nothing. What am I missing?
11
8
5
145
34,871
Lung cancer rates are rising, particularly in people who are not smokers. When my sister Susan was diagnosed in 2023, we were shocked. When I read the news about Pope Leo XIV, I was again shocked. I hope this is a wake-up call for the world that anyone can get lung cancer, regardless of their history with smoking. More people die of lung cancer than of breast, prostate, and colon cancer combined, and we need a new approach to screening and treatment. lnkd.in/p/gNPH8wN8
10
12
1
81
11,862
I understand that people are demanding more access to products and control over their health, but unregulated peptides and “research use only” products are not worth it. There is a time and place to push boundaries but injecting yourself with something that is not proven or of an unknown source is not worth the risks.
Two souls are dead because they self administered something purporting to be the most powerful metabolic agent ever developed - without medical supervision, before the inventor has asked for approval and sourced from a Chinese “lab” seeking to make a quick buck. Peptide World - “Lilly made this up”.
16
14
4
64
16,575