
Wealth Engineering w/Bitcoin | Partner @BTCOppFund | @ArchLending | @BlockwareTeam | 100M+ @YouTube | @iHeartRadio
Joined February 2018
- Tweets26.6K
- Following1.5K
- Followers184K
- Likes39.4K
McKinsey projects up to $5 T of Agentic commerce by 2030, and gave us a framework and the steps to get there.
6 distinct tiers of agentic involvement:
- Level 0 (No Automation): The human manually searches, compares, and purchases items.
- Level 1 (Assisted Discovery): AI helps generate ideas or answers basic search questions.
- Level 2 (Active Curation): AI actively monitors preferences, filters choices, and builds personalized shopping carts.
- Level 3 (Conditional Autonomy): AI acts as a trusted advisor, preparing options and asking, "I found the best match. Should I buy it?"
We've cleared these levels in less than 4 years; what's left?
- Level 4 (High Autonomy): AI manages routine purchases entirely on its own (e.g., auto-replenishing household goods) within set budgets.
were pretty close to this level now
- Level 5 (Full Autonomy / Pure A2A): Your personal agent continuously interacts with brand agents to negotiate custom bundles, dynamic pricing, and optimal logistics without you ever getting involved.
we have real economic actors in need of and creating their own economic system, one built for machines
Fidelity manages $20T and has always been early to the Bitcoin game… they see what’s coming next
$150t securitized fixed income is starting to move
A new source of BTC demand is emerging.
BTC-focused perpetual preferred stocks have accumulated more than 135,000 BTC in just over a year, despite representing only a fraction of the global fixed income market.
What could happen if adoption expands?
🔗 Read our latest research: go.fidelity.com/ernlPz
Tether launched in 2014, for this very reason, to allow the user to avoid the fiat on/off ramps and stay in crypto rail.
The tether white paper and descriptions explicitly listed advantages over traditional fiat banking, stating:
“Transact in USD value pseudonymously without middlemen”
The state has control over fiat rails, but game
Over once the world moves to stables.
The Battle for the Fate of Humanity seems hyperbolic, but…
read this thread, read what @DataRepublican has put out, and then think through the 3rd, 4th and 5th order effects of this
🚨 🚨🚨 I think we're living through a civilizational turning point. And most people haven't realized it yet. 🚨🚨🚨
We keep hearing that the globalist project is collapsing. It isn't. It's alive and well in the European Union, where Brussels keeps marching on as if nothing happened. And in the United States, it didn't die. It mutated.
If you want to see what that mutation looks like, read what DataRepublican just published. According to the audio and the thousands of documents she scraped, a network of former USAID and State Department officials, organized under a group called Renew to Thrive, is working on what they call "the day after tomorrow": what a rewritten American government should look like.
And they're not alone. She reports that this group sits inside a much larger, extremely discreet umbrella, the United Democracy Alliance, which coordinates the major "resistance" NGOs: when protests get deployed, on what timeline, how to respond. Operationalized, according to her, by an organization of 1,600 former military, intelligence and diplomatic officials.
The most chilling part: they've reportedly drafted a list of "red lines" past which the elected federal government should be declared illegitimate. The one they discuss most is invoking the Insurrection Act. And the mechanism doesn't even require governors to sign anything. They just have to refuse federal troops in their state and let the network do the rest.
Senator Mike Lee said he was speechless. Elon replied with one word: "Troubling."
Understand this: for these people, it isn't politics anymore. It's survival. They lost power at the ballot box, so they're building the machinery to contest the very legitimacy of the people who won. Their influence, their networks, their money, their impunity, everything they've built over decades depends on getting back in. So they're going all in.
And this fight is happening at the most decisive moment in human history: the arrival of superintelligence.
Whoever controls the state when AI surpasses humans won't just win an election. They'll win the century.
I only see two scenarios.
Scenario one: the Democrats take back power. Remember what Elon said in 2024: "If he loses, I'm f*cked. How long do you think my prison sentence is going to be?" Everyone laughed. Read those documents again and tell me he was joking. If a movement that pre-writes the criteria for declaring an elected government illegitimate comes back to power, there's a very strong chance Elon gets persecuted. Him, X, and everyone who dared to speak up.
And the world that follows is 1984 with GPUs. A hyper-class owning all the means of production: AI, robots, data, energy. The rest of humanity locked into a form of techno-feudal slavery, on a drip, surveilled, docile. Communism always promised equality and delivered a nomenklatura. With AI, the nomenklatura won't even need the people anymore.
Scenario two: Elon wins with the Republicans. And this deathly project gets dismantled. Not reformed, not slowed down. Dismantled. Every network, every unelected structure, brought into the light. And we finally do what history never had the courage to do: the Nuremberg of communism. The great moral and historical trial of an ideology that killed tens of millions of people and is still trying to sneak back in through the back door.
There is no third way. No lukewarm scenario. The coming decade will decide.
Pick your side while you still have the right to.
On my way to Plan B!
There’s still time to make plans to get there!
This day marks the beginning of the longest and richest week of independent events around a Bitcoin conference ever. Check out planbweek.com: you still have time to join!
Around the world the protests are said to be triggered by “higher prices and less access to services”, and while those symptoms are real, the cause is hidden from the uneducated masses.
A look at this chart reveals the root cause: The State
Anything the state touches gets more expensive. They add demand without adding supply, and worse, their regulations and incentives cause supply destruction.
Anything the state stays away from, and markets can move more freely, prices go down, access becomes cheaper, food become more abundant.
The chart makes it simple to grasp:
Capitalism is the force that drove down the price of almost everything it touched. The state is the force that blew up the price of almost everything it captured.
And young people blame the first for the crimes of the second. Why?
Because the education comes from The State.
Public school, govt supported universities, gov funded media, training the masses to look at everything through an
“Oppressor v Oppressed” lens.
Because it’s never your fault, always the fault of someone, something, we need to be able to blame something.
And the State is never going to educate you to look at them as the problem, in fact… most inside The State aren’t even aware themselves.
But it all boils down to the most simplest of ideas, economics 101
Supply V Demand
So we need more supply than demand, and the chart shows us, we need less state intervention to get there.
Less gov funded demand
Less gov boots on supply
It’s not an accident…
pre planned, watch for it
The past few days, I got my hands on thousands of new transcripts and hundreds of recordings, thanks to leads from @SKDoubleDub33 and @iamlisalogan .
You've heard that the DSA is proposing structural reforms to America, including abolishing the Senate and imposing term limits.
What you not have heard is - there is an operational plan to put it all into action. If the Democratic Party sweeps 2026, then DSA will become "foot soldiers" in constant clashes with the administration to cross a "red line" or invoke a "doomsday scenario" - meaning, President Trump invokes the Insurrection Act, probably sometime in 2027.
Then, a lot of coordinated responses kick off, including delegitimizing the federal government itself and handing that legitimacy to Democratic governors. 2028 then becomes a vote on whether to keep America governance as-is or to burn it all down to appease a "young and brown" demographic.
The mysterious group who's been coordinating 50501, Indivisible, and coordinating the NoKings protests is called "United Democracy Alliance" and their intellectual leader is Erica Chenoweth who came up with the 3.5% rule of nonviolent regime change.
Patience. I know I've hyped this more than anything else. It's genuinely the biggest discovery I've had. This is an enormous archive. This is only the beginning.
heartbreaking to watch, but... we have to see it
what is the point of the state? when they fail to protect your Life Liberty and Property?
This quoted post is unavailable.
I am old enough to remember when this used to be called terrorism.
now Its just any old Saturday... part of the plan
A 15% yield for fixed income investors, is amazing, but… doesn’t mean it’s right for everyone.
To find out if you should, answer:
1. What is my financial goal, how much do I need and by when?
2. How much do I have now?
3. With my limited capital, should I:
- allocate for growth (BTC) that goes up in value but offers no yield, or…or
- yield and income today, but with no cap gains.
Just because it’s a great instrument doesn’t mean it’s perfect for you.
Strive is offering $SATS through an IPO available to select investors.
- 15% fixed-rate perpetual preferred stock
- Cumulative dividends paid every business day
- Junior to SATA
INVESTOR PRESENTATION TIMESTAMPS
00:00 - Introducing SATS
01:46 - Executive Summary
18:50 - SATS Improves SATA
21:06 - Dividend and Balance Sheet Strength
27:33 - Performance and Liquidity
30:48 - Bitcoin Thesis
40:26 - Amplification and Risk
$SATS $ASST $SATA
I hate the BIG Bitcoin forecast, without the math and the path to get there...
If you want the methodology and calculator to model this for yourself, it's here:
xitter.cf/1MarkMoss/status/21071…
You might think $1m is too conservative.
Bitcoin to $1m, $11m, or $43m sounds insane, unless...
you can build and prove a convincing case for it, so... I did, and this time, from a completely different angle because...
All the Bitcoin price models were based on historical Bitcoin prices and then trying to project them into the future.
- Power Law
- Metcalfe's Law
- Stock 2 Flow
- Halving Cycles, epochs
- Regressions
But... past performance doesn't guarantee future results
So... here's how I approached it
(At the end, I give you the link to use the model and see how your own assumptions change things)
@River put out a great piece of research a few weeks ago showing
The world’s largest financial institutions are telling people to buy Bitcoin and take a 2-7% allocation.
This is just starting, the onramps are still under construction. Surely this could help Bitcoin take 8% of the basket share over the next 14 years...
That seems conservative to me
$43m Bitcoin by 2050 all of a sudden starts looking realistic and even conservative under this model.
This would mean BTC would have only 15% of the SoV basket, less than Real Estate, Equities, and about equal to debt
This also assumes the SOV basket grows to debt expectations from IMF/ BIS / CBO, and I think that's an underestimate.
But play with the calculator model and tell me what you think.
go.1markmoss.com/btc-model
Like, RT and Share with the bitcoin skeptic in your life and help them realize the future value of their money today
The system is built for owners, not consumers
But its not about W2 v W9, or how you earn… it’s what you do after you earn
If you buy assets, you’re an owner, now the debt based system builds your wealth as it compounds tax free, but…
Once you sell your assets, you’ve moved from an owner back to consumer, and then…
Taxes take 20-50% of your wealth and the fiat system punishes you.
Be an owner, let the debt based system build your wealth, and keep it safe from taxes.
🇺🇸 The richest 1% of U.S. households are now sitting on about $60 trillion...
That's roughly 32.5% of all household wealth in the country.
The entire bottom half of Americans? About $4.3 trillion combined.
Go even higher and it gets crazier. The richest 0.1% alone have nearly $28 trillion, more than 6 times what the bottom 50% have.
A big reason the gap can grow this fast is where that wealth sits.
The top 0.1% own more than $16 trillion in stocks and mutual funds. The bottom half own less than $400 billion.
And stocks have been climbing. U.S. household wealth just jumped another $12.8 trillion in a single quarter, with rising stocks doing most of the heavy lifting.
Strip away all the giant numbers and that's really it: a tiny slice of the country owns a massive share of its household wealth.
Source: Federal Reserve, Trading View / Writer: Daniyal
















